Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25099844›Full record

ReviewClinical medicine (London, England)2014

'Designer drugs': update on the management of novel psychoactive substance misuse in the acute care setting.

Christopher D Smith, Stefanie Robert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. An Update on the Implications of New Psychoactive Substances in Public Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Drug-induced hyperthermia in critical care.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christopher D SmithAccident and Emergency Department, Whipps Cross Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK christopher.smith10@nhs.net.
Stefanie RobertHomerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of novel psychoactive substances ('legal highs' or 'designer drugs') is increasing worldwide. Patients misusing such substances have been reported to experience severe or prolonged side effects requiring admission to acute or critical care wards. These complications can be life threatening if misdiagnosed or mismanaged. As physicians have traditionally had less involvement with the management of such patients compared with their colleagues in emergency departments an update in the management of such patients is indicated. Here we present a summary of the management of those novel substances with the potential for serious complications based on a review of current literature.

Indexed as

AlkaloidsCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsDesigner DrugsHumansPiperazinePiperazinesPsychotropic DrugsSodium OxybateSubstance-Related DisordersAlkaloidsCannabinoid Receptor AgonistscathinoneDesigner DrugsPiperazinePiperazinesPsychotropic DrugsSodium OxybateComplicationsdesigner drugslegal highsmanagementnovel psychoactive substances

Identifiers

PMID25099844
PMCPMC4952836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.