Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25099816›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2014

Biosensor architectures for high-fidelity reporting of cellular signaling.

Omer Dushek, Annemarie C Lellouch, David J Vaux, Vahid Shahrezaei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Omer DushekSir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom; Wolfson Centre for Mathematical Biology, Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, United Kingdom. Electronic address: omer.dushek@path.ox.ac.uk.
Annemarie C LellouchAix Marseille Université, Laboratoire d'Adhésion et Inflammation, Marseille, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1067, Marseille, France; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR 7333, Marseille, France.
David J VauxSir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Vahid ShahrezaeiDepartment of Mathematics, Imperial College London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: v.shahrezaei@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 098363
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding mechanisms of information processing in cellular signaling networks requires quantitative measurements of protein activities in living cells. Biosensors are molecular probes that have been developed to directly track the activity of specific signaling proteins and their use is revolutionizing our understanding of signal transduction. The use of biosensors relies on the assumption that their activity is linearly proportional to the activity of the signaling protein they have been engineered to track. We use mechanistic mathematical models of common biosensor architectures (single-chain FRET-based biosensors), which include both intramolecular and intermolecular reactions, to study the validity of the linearity assumption. As a result of the classic mechanism of zero-order ultrasensitivity, we find that biosensor activity can be highly nonlinear so that small changes in signaling protein activity can give rise to large changes in biosensor activity and vice versa. This nonlinearity is abolished in architectures that favor the formation of biosensor oligomers, but oligomeric biosensors produce complicated FRET states. Based on this finding, we show that high-fidelity reporting is possible when a single-chain intermolecular biosensor is used that cannot undergo intramolecular reactions and is restricted to forming dimers. We provide phase diagrams that compare various trade-offs, including observer effects, which further highlight the utility of biosensor architectures that favor intermolecular over intramolecular binding. We discuss challenges in calibrating and constructing biosensors and highlight the utility of mathematical models in designing novel probes for cellular signaling.

Indexed as

Signal TransductionBiosensing TechniquesData Interpretation, StatisticalFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferModels, BiologicalObserver VariationPhosphoprotein PhosphatasesProtein BindingProtein KinasesSensitivity and SpecificityPhosphoprotein PhosphatasesProtein Kinases

Identifiers

PMID25099816
PMCPMC4129486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.