ArticleBiophysical journal2014
Contribution of fluorophore dynamics and solvation to resonant energy transfer in protein-DNA complexes: a molecular-dynamics study.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Single-molecule FRET Spectroscopy: From Computational FRET Estimation to Experimental Data Interpretation.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2026Review
- Characterization of Ligand Binding in Human Serum Albumin from Atomistic Energy Transfer Simulations.Small methods · 2025Article
- Computation of Förster Resonance Energy Transfer in Lipid Bilayer Membranes.The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2022Article
- FRET-based dynamic structural biology: Challenges, perspectives and an appeal for open-science practices.eLife · 2021Review
- Loop-closure kinetics reveal a stable, right-handed DNA intermediate in Cre recombination.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Combining Mass Spectrometry and X-Ray Crystallography for Analyzing Native-Like Membrane Protein Lipid Complexes.Frontiers in physiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) experiments, extracting accurate structural information about macromolecules depends on knowing the positions and orientations of donor and acceptor fluorophores. Several approaches have been employed to reduce uncertainties in quantitative FRET distance measurements. Fluorophore-position distributions can be estimated by surface accessibility (SA) calculations, which compute the region of space explored by the fluorophore within a static macromolecular structure. However, SA models generally do not take fluorophore shape, dye transition-moment orientation, or dye-specific chemical interactions into account. We present a detailed molecular-dynamics (MD) treatment of fluorophore dynamics for an ATTO donor/acceptor dye pair and specifically consider as case studies dye-labeled protein-DNA intermediates in Cre site-specific recombination. We carried out MD simulations in both an aqueous solution and glycerol/water mixtures to assess the effects of experimental solvent systems on dye dynamics. Our results unequivocally show that MD simulations capture solvent effects and dye-dye interactions that can dramatically affect energy transfer efficiency. We also show that results from SA models and MD simulations strongly diverge in cases where donor and acceptor fluorophores are in close proximity. Although atomistic simulations are computationally more expensive than SA models, explicit MD studies are likely to give more realistic results in both homogeneous and mixed solvents. Our study underscores the model-dependent nature of FRET analyses, but also provides a starting point to develop more realistic in silico approaches for obtaining experimental ensemble and single-molecule FRET data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.