Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25099796›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2014

If cell mechanics can be described by elastic modulus: study of different models and probes used in indentation experiments.

Nataliia Guz, Maxim Dokukin, Vivekanand Kalaparthi, Igor Sokolov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Measuring the Elastic Properties of Living Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  2. Culture Conditions Shape the Phenotype and Quality ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. ATP8B1 regulates PIP2 localization and cleavage of pyroptotic executioner Gasdermin D.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nataliia GuzDepartment of Physics, Clarkson University, Potsdam, New York.
Maxim DokukinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts.
Vivekanand KalaparthiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts.
Igor SokolovDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts; Department of Physics, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts. Electronic address: igor.sokolov@tufts.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we investigated the question whether cells, being highly heterogeneous objects, could be described with the elastic modulus (effective Young's modulus) in a self-consistent way. We performed a comparative analysis of the elastic modulus derived from the indentation data obtained with atomic force microscopy (AFM) on human cervical epithelial cells (both normal and cancerous). Both sharp (cone) and dull (2500-nm radius sphere) AFM probes were used. The indentation data were processed through different elastic models. The cell was approximated as a homogeneous elastic medium that had either 1), smooth hemispherical boundary (Hertz/Sneddon models) or 2), the boundary covered with a layer of glycocalyx and membrane protrusions ("brush" models). Consistency of these approximations was investigated. Specifically, we tested the independence of the elastic modulus of the indentation depth, which is assumed in these models. We demonstrated that only one model showed consistency in treating cells as a homogeneous elastic medium, namely, the brush model, when processing the indentation data collected with the dull AFM probe. The elastic modulus demonstrated strong depth dependence in all models: Hertz/Sneddon models (no brush taken into account), and when the brush model was applied to the data collected with sharp conical probes. We conclude that it is possible to describe the elastic properties of the cell body by means of an effective elastic modulus, used in a self-consistent way, when using the brush model to analyze data collected with a dull AFM probe. The nature of these results is discussed.

Indexed as

Elastic ModulusModels, BiologicalCells, CulturedCell Surface ExtensionsEpithelial CellsGlycocalyxHumans

Identifiers

PMID25099796
PMCPMC4129501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.