Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25099765›Full record

ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2014

Comparison the efficacy of second-line modified EOX (epirubicin, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine) and irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) regimens in metastatic gastric cancer patients that progressed on first-line modified docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil (DCF) regimen.

Mehmet Ali Nahit Sendur, Nuriye Ozdemir, Tahsin Özatlı, Ozan Yazıcı, Sercan Aksoy, Ahmet Siyar Ekinci, Doğan Yazılıtaş, Yusuf Günaydın, Berna Oksuzoglu, Mustafa Benekli and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Mehmet Ali Nahit SendurDepartment of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Yıldırım Beyazıt University, 06800, Ankara, Turkey, masendur@yahoo.com.tr.
Nuriye Ozdemir
Tahsin Özatlı
Ozan Yazıcı
Sercan Aksoy
Ahmet Siyar Ekinci
Doğan Yazılıtaş
Yusuf Günaydın
Berna Oksuzoglu
Mustafa Benekli
Nurullah Zengin
Education Training And Research · USAnkara University · TRGazi University · TRAnkara Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRAnkara Yıldırım Beyazıt University · TRHacettepe University Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric cancer is often diagnosed in advanced stage. Palliative chemotherapy or best supportive care is recommended for patients with metastatic gastric patients. In several clinical trials, palliative chemotherapy improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), but the survival benefit of second-line chemotherapy was demonstrated in small cohort studies. The main aim of our study was to compare retrospectively the efficacy of second-line modified EOX (epirubicin, oxaliplatin and capecitabine) [mEOX] and irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) regimens in metastatic gastric cancer patients that progressed on first-line modified docetaxel-cisplatin-fluorouracil (DCF) regimen. Metastatic gastric cancer patients who progressed on modified DCF regimens were included. A total 105 patients were included to this study; 55 and 50 patients were treated with mEOX and FOLFIRI regimens, respectively. The clinicopathological and demographic characteristics of all patients were collected from the medical charts. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was carried out for PFS and OS. The median follow-up of our study was 16 (4-85) months. In both groups, all of the patients were treated with first-line mDCF. Median cycle of second-line chemotherapy was 3 (1-8) and 3.5 (1-6) in EOX and FOLFIRI groups, respectively (P = 0.44). Overall response rate was observed in 34.6 % and 42.0 % of patients second-line chemotherapy in mEOX and FOLFIRI arms, respectively (P = 0.17). Median PFS was 5.5 and 6.3 months in mEOX and FOLFIRI arms, respectively (P = 0.98). Median OS was 6.9 and 7.0 months in mEOX and FOLFIRI arms, respectively, from the time of beginning second-line chemotherapy protocol (P = 0.89). As compared with FOLFIRI regimen, mEOX regimen was associated with less neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia. Dose reduction and dose delay were significantly higher in FOLFIRI group compared to mEOX group (P < 0.001). In our trial, triplet regimens mEOX and FOLFIRI regimens have similar efficacy as second-line treatment for patients with metastatic gastric cancer. FOLFIRI regimen was associated with more hematological toxicity.

Indexed as

Stomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCamptothecinFebrile NeutropeniaFemaleFluorouracilHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLeucovorinMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsCamptothecinFluorouracilLeucovorin

Identifiers

PMID25099765
OpenAlexW2032549530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.