ArticleHuman resources for health2014
Outcome and impact of Master of Public Health programs across six countries: education for change.
Article in Human resources for health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Exploring taught masters education for healthcare practitioners: a systematic review of literature.BMC medical education · 2019Pooled it
- Career trajectories of master of public health graduates from South African universities.Human resources for health · 2026Article
- The Dental Public Health Workforce: Employer Expectations and Future Directions.Journal of dental education · 2025Article
- Professional development: a mixed methods study of Masters of Public Health alumni.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Master's degree in sexual and reproductive health: enhancing career development opportunities for midwives in Mali.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Human resources for health interventions in high- and middle-income countries: findings of an evidence review.Human resources for health · 2020Review
- Sources of Health care providers' Self-efficacy to deliver Health Education: a qualitative study.BMC medical education · 2019Article
- The potential of an online educational platform to contribute to achieving sustainable development goals: a mixed-methods evaluation of the Peoples-uni online platform.Health research policy and systems · 2018Article
- Schools of public health in low and middle-income countries: an imperative investment for improving the health of populations?BMC public health · 2016Review
- Impact of MPH programs: contributing to health system strengthening in low- and middle-income countries?Human resources for health · 2016Article
- Assessment of students' perspectives about master of public health program in medical school of Shiraz University.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2016Article
- Mobilising the alumni of a Master of Public Health degree to build research and development capacity in low- and middle-income settings: The Peoples-uni.Health research policy and systems · 2015Article
- Master of Public Health programmes in South Africa: issues and challenges.Public health reviewsReview
- Postgraduate Employment Outcomes of Undergraduate and Graduate Public Health Students : A Scoping Review.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe human resources for health crisis has highlighted the need for high-level public health education to add specific capacities to the workforce. Recently, it was questioned whether Master of Public Health (MPH) training prepared graduates with competencies relevant to low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study aims to examine the influence of the MPH programs geared towards LMICs offered in Vietnam, China, South Africa, Mexico, Sudan, and the Netherlands on graduates' careers, application of acquired competencies, performance at the workplace, and their professional contribution to society.
methodsA self-administered questionnaire was sent to graduates from six MPH programs. Frequency distributions of the answers were calculated, and a bivariate analysis and logistic regression of certain variables was performed.
resultsThe response rate was 37.5%. Graduates reported change in leadership (69%), in technical position (69%), acquiring new responsibilities (80%), and increased remuneration (63%); they asserted that MPH programs contributed significantly to this. Graduates' attribution of their application of 7 key competencies 'substantially to the MPH program' ranged from 33% to 48%. Of the 26 impact variables, graduates attributed the effect they had on their workplace substantially to the MPH program; the highest rated variable ranged from 31% to 73% and the lowest ranged from 9% to 43%. Of the 10 impact variables on society, graduates attributed the effect they had on society substantially to the MPH program; for the highest rated variable (13% to 71%); for the lowest rated variable (4% to 42%). Candidates' attribution of their application of acquired competencies as well as their impact at the workplace varied significantly according to institution of study and educational background.
conclusionsThis study concludes that these MPH programs contribute to improving graduates' careers and to building leadership in public health. The MPH programs contribute to graduates' application of competencies. MPH programs contribute substantially towards impact variables on the workplace, such as development of research proposals and reporting on population health needs, and less substantially to their impact on society, such as contributing equitable access to quality services. Differences reported between MPH programs merit further study. The results can be used for curriculum reform.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.