Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2015
Model-based evaluation of drug-induced QTc prolongation for compounds in early development.
Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Translating QT interval prolongation from conscious dogs to humans.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017Article
- Characterizing QT interval prolongation in early clinical development: a case study with methadone.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2017Article
- PK/PD Modelling of the QT Interval: a Step Towards Defining the Translational Relationship Between In Vitro, Awake Beagle Dogs, and Humans.The AAPS journal · 2016Article
- Assessment of Interspecies Differences in Drug-Induced QTc Interval Prolongation in Cynomolgus Monkeys, Dogs and Humans.Pharmaceutical research · 2016Article
- Modelling of drug-induced QT-interval prolongation: estimation approaches and translational opportunities.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2015Article
- Modeling and Simulation Approaches for Cardiovascular Function and Their Role in Safety Assessment.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsSignificant differences between dogs and humans have been observed in the concentration-QTc effect relationship of compounds with known pro-arrhythmic properties. These findings suggest that interspecies differences must be considered when evaluating drug effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a model-based approach to assess the risk of QTc prolongation for three investigational compounds (NCE01, NCE02 and NCE03).
methodsPharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data from experiments in conscious dogs and healthy subjects were included in this analysis. Pharmacokinetic modelling and deconvolution methods were applied to derive drug concentrations at the time of each QT measurement. An integrated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model was then used to describe QT prolongation. A threshold of ≥10 ms was used to characterize the probability of QTc prolongation.
resultsThe PKPD relationships of all three compounds were successfully described in both species. A strong effect was observed after administration of NCE01 to dogs and humans, with a slope of 0.0061 and 0.0662 ms nm(-1), respectively, and maximal probability of QTc prolongation ≥10 ms at peak concentration. For NCE02 and NCE03, QTc-shortening and borderline QT effects were observed both in dogs and humans, as described by negative or very shallow slopes (NCE02, -0.00098 and -0.01 ms nm(-1); NCE03, 0.00064 and -0.0002 ms nm(-1)).
conclusionsWhilst NEC01 shows clear pro-arrhythmic effects, the liability for QT/QTc prolongation for NCE02 and NCE03 can be deemed low at the expected therapeutic exposure. Moreover, our results show the advantages of an integrated PKPD approach as the basis for translating pro-arrhythmic effects from dogs to humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.