Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25099186›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2014

A sparse Ising model with covariates.

Jie Cheng, Elizaveta Levina, Pei Wang, Ji Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Connectivity Regression.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Jointly estimating individual and group networks from fMRI data.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  6. Multi-task Learning for Gaussian Graphical Regressions with High Dimensional Covariates.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2024
    Article
  7. Covariate-Assisted Bayesian Graph Learning for Heterogeneous Data.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Bayesian graphical models for modern biological applications.Statistical methods & applications · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Bayesian Graphical Regression.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jie ChengDepartment of Statistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.
Elizaveta Levina
Pei Wang
Ji Zhu

Funding

The Early Detection Research Network: Data Management and Coordinating CenterU24CA086368 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI RUTH D ETZIONI, Ziding Feng · 2010 to 2026
$75.7M
Use of Biomarkers in Diagnosis, Prognosis, Risk Prediction and Early Detection ofP01CA053996 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI HSU, LI · 1991 to 2015
$9.4M
Raman Markers of Allograft OsseointegrationR01AR056646 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MORRIS, MICHAEL DAVID · 2009 to 2012
$2.0M
Statistical Methods for Integrative Analysis of Genomics and Proteomics DataR01GM082802 · NIGMS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI WANG, PEI · 2008 to 2012
$1.4M
Sparse Structure Identification from High-Dimensional Epigenomic DataR01GM096194 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ZHU, JI · 2010 to 2013
$1.0M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA053996NCI NIH HHS P01CA53996NCI NIH HHS U24 CA086368NCI NIH HHS U24CA086368NIAMS NIH HHS 5-R01-AR-056646-03NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056646NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM082802NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM082802NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM096194NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM096194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been a lot of work fitting Ising models to multivariate binary data in order to understand the conditional dependency relationships between the variables. However, additional covariates are frequently recorded together with the binary data, and may influence the dependence relationships. Motivated by such a dataset on genomic instability collected from tumor samples of several types, we propose a sparse covariate dependent Ising model to study both the conditional dependency within the binary data and its relationship with the additional covariates. This results in subject-specific Ising models, where the subject's covariates influence the strength of association between the genes. As in all exploratory data analysis, interpretability of results is important, and we use ℓ1 penalties to induce sparsity in the fitted graphs and in the number of selected covariates. Two algorithms to fit the model are proposed and compared on a set of simulated data, and asymptotic results are established. The results on the tumor dataset and their biological significance are discussed in detail.

Indexed as

Genes, Tumor SuppressorModels, StatisticalBreast NeoplasmsComputer SimulationFemaleGenetic Association StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMagneticsMagnetsMarkov ChainsNeoplasm ProteinsNorwayPrevalenceQuantum TheoryRisk FactorsNeoplasm ProteinsBinary Markov networkGraphical modelIsing modelLassoPseudo-likelihoodTumor suppressor genes

Identifiers

PMID25099186
PMCPMC4425428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.