Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25098812›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutical research2014

In vitro cerebrovascular modeling in the 21st century: current and prospective technologies.

Christopher A Palmiotti, Shikha Prasad, Pooja Naik, Kaisar M D Abul, Ravi K Sajja, Anilkumar H Achyuta, Luca Cucullo

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutical research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Advances in the Model Structure of In Vitro Vascularized Organ-on-a-Chip.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Exposure to hypoglycemia and risk of stroke.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2018
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher A PalmiottiDraper Laboratory Bioengineering Center, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Shikha Prasad
Pooja Naik
Kaisar M D Abul
Ravi K Sajja
Anilkumar H Achyuta
Luca Cucullo
Texas Tech University · USDraper Laboratory · USTexas Tech University Health Sciences Center · US

Funding

Testing tobacco smoke toxicity at the blood-brain barrierR01DA029121 · NIDA · TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIS CENTER · PI ABBRUSCATO, THOMAS J, CUCULLO, LUCA · 2011 to 2021
$3.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA029121NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA029121-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) maintains the brain homeostasis and dynamically responds to events associated with systemic and/or rheological impairments (e.g., inflammation, ischemia) including the exposure to harmful xenobiotics. Thus, understanding the BBB physiology is crucial for the resolution of major central nervous system CNS) disorders challenging both health care providers and the pharmaceutical industry. These challenges include drug delivery to the brain, neurological disorders, toxicological studies, and biodefense. Studies aimed at advancing our understanding of CNS diseases and promoting the development of more effective therapeutics are primarily performed in laboratory animals. However, there are major hindering factors inherent to in vivo studies such as cost, limited throughput and translational significance to humans. These factors promoted the development of alternative in vitro strategies for studying the physiology and pathophysiology of the BBB in relation to brain disorders as well as screening tools to aid in the development of novel CNS drugs. Herein, we provide a detailed review including pros and cons of current and prospective technologies for modelling the BBB in vitro including ex situ, cell based and computational (in silico) models. A special section is dedicated to microfluidic systems including micro-BBB, BBB-on-a-chip, Neurovascular Unit-on-a-Chip and Synthetic Microvasculature Blood-brain Barrier.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierCerebrovascular CirculationComputer SimulationHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesNervous System Diseases

Identifiers

PMID25098812
PMCPMC4225221
OpenAlexW2116759862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.