Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25098698›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2014

Incidence and characteristics of melanoma brain metastases developing during treatment with vemurafenib.

L Peuvrel, M Saint-Jean, G Quéreux, A Brocard, A Khammari, A C Knol, B Dréno

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Targeted Therapies for Melanoma Brain Metastases.Current treatment options in neurology · 2017
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. [Melanoma brain metastases : Treatment options].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2016
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

L PeuvrelDepartment of Dermato-Cancerology, Nantes University Hospital, INSERM U892-CNRS U6299, CIC Biothérapie INSERM 0503, 1 place Alexis Ricordeau, 44000, Nantes, France.
M Saint-Jean
G Quéreux
A Brocard
A Khammari
A C Knol
B Dréno
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vemurafenib is indicated for the treatment of patients with BRAF (V600)-mutant metastatic melanoma. We studied for the first time the characteristics of brain metastases developed during treatment with vemurafenib in real-life conditions. We included all patients treated over 3 years with vemurafenib in our department for metastatic melanoma without initial brain involvement. Our primary endpoint was to assess the incidence of brain metastases in these patients. Our secondary endpoints were to identify the risk factors for metastases occurrence and their characteristics and course. In our retrospective cohort of 86 patients, 20% had developed brain metastases on average 5.3 months after vemurafenib initiation. The median follow-up was 9 months (1-26 months). Radiological examinations revealed multiple brain metastases in 41% of patients. The only risk factor for metastasis occurrence identified was a high number of metastatic sites when initiating vemurafenib (p = 0.045). Metastasis development was associated with a trend toward a decrease in overall survival from 12.8 to 8.5 months (p = 0.07) and a significant decrease in progression-free survival from 7 to 5 months (p = 0.04). Among the patients who developed brain metastases, 82% died, of whom 64% within 3 months, versus 58% of patients without brain metastases over the same period. The extra-cerebral disease was well controlled in 59% of patients during brain progression. In vemurafenib-treated melanoma patients, brain metastases are frequent and associated with a particularly poor prognosis. Because of their high frequency in patients with controlled extra-cerebral disease, brain explorations should be systematically performed during treatment.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFranceHumansIncidenceIndolesMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProtein Kinase InhibitorsRisk FactorsSulfonamidesIndolesProtein Kinase InhibitorsSulfonamidesVemurafenib

Identifiers

PMID25098698
OpenAlexW2032714571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.