Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25098681›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2015

Evaluation of blood culture media for the detection of fungi.

U Nawrot, B Kowalska-Krochmal, B Sulik-Tyszka, M Kozak, K Świętek, M Pajączkowska, E Piątkowska, D Rosiak, E Swoboda-Kopeć

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Brazilian guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis in adults and children.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Diagnostic and prognostic value of time to positivity in blood cultures. An opinion paper.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Different BD BACTECDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A culture-free biphasic approach for sensitive and rapid detection of pathogens in dried whole-blood matrix.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Comparison of BACTEC™ blood culture media for the detection of fungemia.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

U NawrotDepartment of Microbiology, Medical University of Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland. urszula.nawrot@umed.wroc.pl.
B Kowalska-KrochmalDepartment of Microbiology, Medical University of Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland.
B Sulik-TyszkaDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
M KozakDepartment of Diagnostics, Laboratory of Microbiology, Military Hospital, Wrocław, Poland.
K ŚwiętekDepartment of Microbiology, Medical University of Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland.
M PajączkowskaDepartment of Microbiology, Medical University of Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland.
E PiątkowskaDepartment of Microbiology, Medical University of Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland.
D RosiakDepartment of Diagnostics, Laboratory of Microbiology, Military Hospital, Wrocław, Poland.
E Swoboda-KopećDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
University of Wrocław · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the utility of BACTEC™ Mycosis-IC/F (Mycosis), BACTEC™ Plus Aerobic/F (Aerobic), and BACTEC™ Plus Anaerobic/F (Anaerobic) media in the detection of fungi from simulated (obtained by the inoculation of tested media first with sterile sheep's blood and subsequently with one of 60 clinical yeast isolates) and clinical blood samples, taken during routine diagnostic examination in two hospitals. All tested strains grew on Mycosis as well as Aerobic bottles, and the time to detection obtained for Mycosis was significantly shorter (p < 0.05). The largest differences in the time to positivity was found for Candida glabrata and Cryptococcus neoformans, when Mycosis preceded Aerobic in 20-48 h (mean 35.5 h) and 0.7-64 h (mean 24 h), respectively. On the contrary, C. krusei were detected earlier in Aerobic media. In clinical samples, the detection of C. glabrata was also significantly faster in Mycosis than in Aerobic (29.22 ± 11.48 h compared to 86 ± 40 h). The media complement each other and, in 45% of clinical examination sets, a single positive medium was noted (25% in Mycosis and 19% in Aerobic). The study proved that both Aerobic and Mycosis media serve as the correct condition for the culture of fungi and that they varied significantly in the detection time of clinically important species. This result could suggest that the simultaneous use of Aerobic as well as Mycosis media may improve the time of diagnosis in many patients, especially those infected with C. glabrata or C. neoformans.

Indexed as

Culture MediaFungiHumansMicrobiological TechniquesMycosesTime FactorsCulture Media

Identifiers

PMID25098681
PMCPMC4281371
OpenAlexW2092102571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.