Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25098657›Full record

ArticleJournal of athletic training

Drinking to thirst versus drinking ad libitum during road cycling.

Lawrence E Armstrong, Evan C Johnson, Laura J Kunces, Matthew S Ganio, Daniel A Judelson, Brian R Kupchak, Jakob L Vingren, Colleen X Munoz, Robert A Huggins, Jay R Hydren and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of athletic training. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Effect of Fluid Availability on Consumption and Perceptual Measures during Aerobic Exercise.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lawrence E ArmstrongUniversity of Connecticut, Storrs.
Evan C Johnson
Laura J Kunces
Matthew S Ganio
Daniel A Judelson
Brian R Kupchak
Jakob L Vingren
Colleen X Munoz
Robert A Huggins
Jay R Hydren
Nicole E Moyen
Keith H Williamson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe sensation of thirst is different from the complex behavior of drinking ad libitum. Rehydration recommendations to athletes differ, depending on the source, yet no previous researchers have systematically compared drinking to thirst (D(TT)) versus ad libitum drinking behavior (D(AL)).

objectiveTo compare 2 groups of trained cyclists (D(TT) and D(AL)) who had similar physical characteristics and training programs (P > .05). The D(TT) group (n = 12, age = 47 ± 7 years) drank only when thirsty, whereas the D(AL) group (n = 12, age = 44 ± 7 years) consumed fluid ad libitum (ie, whenever and in whatever volume desired).

designCohort study.

settingRoad cycling (164 km) in the heat (36.1 °C ± 6.5 °C). PATIENTS OR OTHER

participantsUltraendurance cyclists (4 women, 20 men). INTERVENTION(S): We recorded measurements 1 day before the event, on event day before the start, at 3 roadside aid stations, at the finish line, and 1 day after the event. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Body mass, urinary hydration indices, and food and fluids consumed.

resultsNo between-groups differences were seen on event day for total exercise time (DTT = 6.69 ± 0.89 hours, DAL = 6.66 ± 0.77 hours), urinary indices (specific gravity, color), body mass change (D(TT) = -2.22% ± 1.73%, DAL = -2.29% ± 1.62%), fluid intake (D(TT) = 5.63 ± 2.59 L/6.7 h, D(AL) = 6.04 ± 2.37 L/6.7 h), dietary energy intake, macronutrient intake, ratings of thirst (D(TT) start = 2 ± 1, D(TT) finish = 6 ± 1, DAL start = 2 ± 1, D(AL) finish = 6 ± 1), pain, perceived exertion, or thermal sensation. Total fluid intake on recovery day +1 was the primary significant difference (D(AL) = 5.13 ± 1.87 L/24 h, D(TT) = 3.13 ± 1.53 L/24 h, t18 = 2.59, P = .02).

conclusionsObservations on event day indicated that drinking to thirst and drinking ad libitum resulted in similar physiologic and perceptual outcomes. This suggests that specific instructions to "drink to thirst" were unnecessary. Indeed, if athletes drink ad libitum, they can focus on training and competition rather than being distracted by ongoing evaluation of thirst sensations.

Indexed as

AthletesAdultBicyclingDehydrationDrinkingFemaleFluid TherapyHumansMaleMiddle AgedThirstelectrolytesfluidsrehydrationsport nutritionurine

Identifiers

PMID25098657
PMCPMC4208866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.