SynthesisBrazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica2014
A meta-analysis of probiotics for preventing necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm neonates.
Synthesis in Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effectiveness of treatment with probiotics in preventing necrotizing enterocolitis and related mortality: results from an umbrella meta-analysis on meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Gut microbiota during pregnancy: a bibliometric analysis of global research trends and collaborative networks.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Meta-Analysis: Randomized Trials ofFrontiers in immunology · 2021Pooled it
- Clinical effect of probiotics in prevention or treatment of gastrointestinal disease in dogs: A systematic review.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Standardized feeding regimen for reducing necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants: an updated systematic review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2017Pooled it
- The Microbiome of Infants Recruited to a Randomised Placebo-controlled Probiotic Trial (PiPS Trial).EBioMedicine · 2017Trial
- Vaginal and oral probiotics effect in the prevention of preterm delivery in patients visiting Kamali Hospital, Karaj, Iran in 2020.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2022Article
- The role and mechanisms of miRNA in neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
- E-SCOPE: A Strategic Approach to Identify and Accelerate Implementation of Evidence-based Best Practices.Medical care · 2019Article
- Dysbiosis and Prematurity: Is There a Role for Probiotics?Nutrients · 2019Review
- Preventing necrotizing enterocolitis by food additives in neonates: A network meta-analysis revealing the efficacy and safety.Medicine · 2017Review
- Survey and evidence based review of probiotics used in very low birth weight preterm infants within the United States.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2016Article
- [Research progress of the application of probiotics in preterm infants].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2016Review
- Benefits of Bifidobacterium breve M-16V Supplementation in Preterm Neonates - A Retrospective Cohort Study.PloS one · 2016Article
- Prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis with probiotics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.PeerJ · 2016Article
- Protective Effect of Dual-Strain Probiotics in Preterm Infants: A Multi-Center Time Series Analysis.PloS one · 2016Article
- Is there a role for probiotics in the prevention of preterm birth?Frontiers in immunology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is one of the most common acquired diseases of the gastrointestinal tract in preterm infants. Some randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) have indicated that probiotics may potentially lower the incidence of NEC and mortality. However, debate still remains about the safety of probiotics and their influence on normal infant growth. We performed this meta-analysis to assess the safety and benefits of probiotic supplementation in preterm infants. We searched in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for English references, and in Wanfang, VIP, and CNKI databases for Chinese references. Ultimately, 27 RCTs (including 9 Chinese articles) were incorporated into this meta-analysis. Relative risk (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) were calculated using a random-effects or fixed-effects model, depending on the data type and heterogeneity. A total of 6655 preterm infants, including the probiotic group (n=3298) and the placebo group (n=3357), were eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis. For Bell stage ≥I and gestational age <37 weeks, risk of NEC incidence was significantly lower in the probiotic group [RR=0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.27-0.44, P<0.00001]. For Bell stage ≥II or gestational age <34 weeks, there were likewise significant differences between the probiotic and placebo groups concerning NEC incidence (RR=0.34, 95%CI=0.25-0.48, P<0.00001; and RR=0.39, 95%CI=0.27-0.56, P<0.00001). Risk of death was significantly reduced in the probiotic group (RR=0.58, 95%CI=0.46-0.75, P<0.0001). In contrast, there was no significant difference concerning the risk of sepsis (RR=0.94, 95%CI=0.83-1.06, P=0.31). With respect to weight gain and the age at which infants reached full feeds, no significant differences were found between the probiotic and placebo groups (WMD=1.07, 95%CI=-0.21-2.34, P=0.10; and WMD=-1.66, 95%CI=-3.6-0.27, P=0.09). This meta-analysis has shown that, regardless of gestational age and NEC stage, probiotic supplementation could significantly reduce the risk of NEC in preterm infants. Analysis also indicated that such supplementation did not increase the incidence risk of sepsis or of mortality. Finally, the study showed that probiotic supplementation may have no adverse effect on normal feeding and growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.