Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25097879›Full record

SynthesisTheScientificWorldJournal2014

The microRNAs as prognostic biomarkers for survival in esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Wenbo Fu, Lijuan Pang, Yunzhao Chen, Lan Yang, Janbo Zhu, Yutao Wei

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in TheScientificWorldJournal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Non-coding RNAs deregulation in oral squamous cell carcinoma: advances and challenges.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2016
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wenbo FuMedical College of Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang 832000, China ; Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Urumchi, Xinjiang 830002, China.
Lijuan PangDepartment of Pathology, Medical College of Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang 832000, China.
Yunzhao ChenDepartment of Pathology, Medical College of Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang 832000, China.
Lan YangDepartment of Pathology, Medical College of Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang 832000, China.
Janbo ZhuDepartment of Pathology, Medical College of Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang 832000, China.
Yutao WeiDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Urumchi, Xinjiang 830002, China ; Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, First Hospital Affiliated to Medical College of Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang 832000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe performed this meta-analysis to summarize all the results from available studies, aiming delineating the prognostic role of miRNA in esophageal cancer. DESIGN AND

methodsWe searched the electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, and ISI Web of Science without time restrictions for the correlative literature to aggregate the survival results. Relevant data were extracted from studies investigating the relationship between miRNAs expression and survival in esophageal cancer patients. Pooled hazard ratios of miR-21 and miR-375 for OS in ESCC were calculated.

resultsA total of 25 studies involving 2,258 subjects analyzed the relationship between miRNA and prognosis of EC. In all, thirty-nine miRNAs associated with prognosis were reported in these studies. The pooled HR of higher miR-21 expression compared with lower miR-21 expression in ESCC was 1.84 (95% CI: 1.41-2.40, P < 0.001), which could significantly predict poorer OS in ESCC. Besides, higher miR-375 was also a significant predictor for OS in ESCC, with a pooled HR of 0.55 (95% CI: 0.42-0.72, P < 0.001).

conclusionsOur results support that miR-21 and miR-375 have a prognostic role in ESCC and may be useful therapeutic targets for the treatment of ESCC and meticulous follow-up for early detection of recurrence.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorEsophageal NeoplasmsHumansMicroRNAsPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsMIRN21 microRNA, humanMIRN375 microRNA, human

Identifiers

PMID25097879
PMCPMC4109072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.