Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25097748›Full record

ArticleInterface focus2014

The ecology of cancer from an evolutionary game theory perspective.

Jorge M Pacheco, Francisco C Santos, David Dingli

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interface focus, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Modeling tumors as species-rich ecological communities.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Reuniting philosophy and science to advance cancer research.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Evolutionary dynamics within and among competing groups.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jorge M PachecoDepartamento de Matemática e Aplicações , Universidade do Minho , Braga 4710-057 , Portugal ; Centro de Biologia Molecular e Ambiental , Universidade do Minho , Braga 4710-057 , Portugal ; ATP-Group, CMAF , Instituto para a Investigação Interdisciplinar , Lisboa 1649-003 , Portugal.
Francisco C SantosINESC-ID and Instituto Superior Técnico , Universidade de Lisboa , Taguspark, Porto Salvo, Lisboa 2744-016 , Portugal ; ATP-Group, CMAF , Instituto para a Investigação Interdisciplinar , Lisboa 1649-003 , Portugal.
David DingliDivision of Hematology and Department of Molecular Medicine , Mayo Clinic , 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905 , USA.
Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores Investigação e Desenvolvimento · PTMayo Clinic · USUniversity of Minho · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accumulation of somatic mutations, to which the cellular genome is permanently exposed, often leads to cancer. Analysis of any tumour shows that, besides the malignant cells, one finds other 'supporting' cells such as fibroblasts, immune cells of various types and even blood vessels. Together, these cells generate the microenvironment that enables the malignant cell population to grow and ultimately lead to disease. Therefore, understanding the dynamics of tumour growth and response to therapy is incomplete unless the interactions between the malignant cells and normal cells are investigated in the environment in which they take place. The complex interactions between cells in such an ecosystem result from the exchange of information in the form of cytokines- and adhesion-dependent interactions. Such processes impose costs and benefits to the participating cells that may be conveniently recast in the form of a game pay-off matrix. As a result, tumour progression and dynamics can be described in terms of evolutionary game theory (EGT), which provides a convenient framework in which to capture the frequency-dependent nature of ecosystem dynamics. Here, we provide a tutorial review of the central aspects of EGT, establishing a relation with the problem of cancer. Along the way, we also digress on fitness and of ways to compute it. Subsequently, we show how EGT can be applied to the study of the various manifestations and dynamics of multiple myeloma bone disease and its preceding condition known as monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. We translate the complex biochemical signals into costs and benefits of different cell types, thus defining a game pay-off matrix. Then we use the well-known properties of the EGT equations to reduce the number of core parameters that characterize disease evolution. Finally, we provide an interpretation of these core parameters in terms of what their function is in the ecosystem we are describing and generate predictions on the type and timing of interventions that can alter the natural history of these two conditions.

Indexed as

cancer ecologycell population dynamicsevolutionary game theoryfitness driven dynamicsfrequency-dependent selectionsomatic evolution of cancer

Identifiers

PMID25097748
PMCPMC4071510
OpenAlexW2072351024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.