Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25097671›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2014

Self-referred patients at the Emergency Department: patient characteristics, motivations, and willingness to make a copayment.

Janneke de Valk, Elisabeth M Taal, Mariette S Nijhoff, Maren H Harms, Esther Mm Lieshout, Peter Patka, Pleunie Pm Rood

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Janneke de ValkDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, 3000, CA, The Netherlands.
Elisabeth M TaalDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, 3000, CA, The Netherlands.
Mariette S NijhoffDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, 3000, CA, The Netherlands.
Maren H HarmsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, 3000, CA, The Netherlands.
Esther Mm LieshoutTrauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, 3000, CA, The Netherlands.
Peter PatkaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, 3000, CA, The Netherlands.
Pleunie Pm RoodDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, 3000, CA, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn many countries, including the Netherlands, a substantial number of patients visit the Emergency Department (ED) without a referral by a general practitioner. The goal of this study was to determine the characteristics and motivations of self-referred patients (SRPs) at the ED. The secondary objective was to explore SRPs' opinion about copayments.

methodsA survey, in seven different languages was performed among SRPs from October 2011 until January 2012 at an academic ED in the Netherlands. Patients were included on 21 day-, 21 evening-, and 21 nightshifts during week and weekend days equally. Patient characteristics, motivations, complaints, diagnosis, and the opinion regarding copayments were examined.

resultsA total of 436 SRPs were included (response rate 82%). Forty-seven percent of the ED population was self-referred. SRPs were mainly male (58%), between 18 and 35 years (54%), Dutch (67%), single without children (42%), and low-educated (73%). The most commonly presented complaints were of musculoskeletal origin (35%). Expected need for additional medical care (e.g., X-rays, blood tests) was the reason to visit the ED for 28% of the SRPs. Around 30% of the SRPs were not prepared to pay for an ED visit. Fifty percent of SRPs were prepared to pay up to 25 or 50 EUR. Highly educated patients were willing to pay more than patients with a low level of education (p < 0.05).

conclusionsSRPs (47% of the total ED population) are often young men with musculoskeletal complaints. They are convinced that additional medical tests are necessary. About 70% of the SRPs are willing to make a copayment, half of the SRPs with a maximum between 25 EUR and 50 EUR. As highly educated SRPs are prepared to pay more, introducing copayments might influence equity in health care accessibility.

Indexed as

CopaymentEmergency DepartmentGeneral practitionerGeneral Practitioner cooperativeHealth services accessibilityPatient motivationsSelf-referred patients

Identifiers

PMID25097671
PMCPMC4115339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.