ArticleDental research journal2014
Fascin expression in pleomorphic adenoma and mucoepidermoid carcinoma.
Article in Dental research journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSalivary gland tumors constitute an important part of oral and maxillofacial pathology. Pleomorphic adenoma (PA) and mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) are the most common benign and malignant salivary gland tumors. Fascin is an actin-bundling protein that increases the motility of normal and transformed epithelial cells. The aims of the study were to determine the expression of fascin in these tumors and to determine its role in their progression. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 40 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks of PA, and 20 blocks of MEC were included in this study. Diagnostic confirmation was performed through examination of hematoxylin and eosin sections. Both tumors were immunohistochemically analyzed for the presence of fascin using Avidin-Biotin complex method and evaluated via light microscope by 2 independent observers. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-square tests with significant level of P < 0.05.
resultsIn both the tumors, the percentage of stained cells was significantly correlated with intensity of staining (P = 0.01 in PA and P = 0.00 in MEC). In PA, statistical analysis showed a significant direct correlation between percentage of stained cells and recurrence (P = 0.00).
conclusionFascin might be a useful marker for recurrence of PAs and patients with high fascin expression in primary PA should be followed up periodically to detect potential recurrence as soon as possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25097648PMC4119371W1518235954What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.