Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25097385›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2014

SCNProDB: A database for the identification of soybean cyst nematode proteins.

Savithiry Natarajan, Mona Tavakolan, Nadim W Alkharouf, Benjamin F Matthews

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Savithiry NatarajanUSDA-ARS, Soybean Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
Mona TavakolanDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, Towson University, Towson, MD 21252, USA.
Nadim W AlkharoufDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, Towson University, Towson, MD 21252, USA.
Benjamin F MatthewsUSDA-ARS, Soybean Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
Agricultural Research Service · USTowson University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines, SCN) is the most destructive pathogen of soybean around the world. Crop rotation and resistant cultivars are used to mitigate the damage of SCN, but these approaches are not completely successful because of the varied SCN populations. Thus, the limitations of these practices with soybean dictate investigation of other avenues of protection of soybean against SCN, perhaps through genetically engineering of broad resistance to SCN. For better understanding of the consequences of genetic manipulation, elucidation of SCN protein composition at the subunit level is necessary. We have conducted studies to determine the composition of SCN proteins using a proteomics approach in our laboratory using twodimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2D-PAGE) to separate SCN proteins and to characterize the proteins further using mass spectrometry. Our analysis resulted in the identification of several hundred proteins. In this investigation, we developed a web based database (SCNProDB) containing protein information obtained from our previous published studies. This database will be useful to scientists who wish to develop SCN resistant soybean varieties through genetic manipulation and breeding efforts. The database is freely accessible from: http://bioinformatics.towson.edu/Soybean_SCN_proteins_2D_Gel_DB/Gel1.aspx.

Indexed as

2D-PAGELC-MS/MSMALDI-TOF-MSnematodeproteinsSCNSoybean

Identifiers

PMID25097385
PMCPMC4110433
OpenAlexW2002720752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.