Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25097373›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2014

Phylogenetic reconstruction of endophytic fungal isolates using internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) region.

Kathamuthu GokulRaj, Natesan Sundaresan, Enthai Jagan Ganeshan, Pandi Rajapriya, Johnpaul Muthumary, Jayavel Sridhar, Mohan Pandi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kathamuthu GokulRajDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, School of Biotechnology, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai - 21, Tamil Nadu, India.
Natesan SundaresanDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, School of Biotechnology, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai - 21, Tamil Nadu, India.
Enthai Jagan GaneshanDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, School of Biotechnology, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai - 21, Tamil Nadu, India.
Pandi RajapriyaDepartment of Microbial Technology, School of Biological Sciences, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai - 21, Tamil Nadu,India.
Johnpaul MuthumaryCentre for Advanced Studies in Botany, University of Madras, Guindy Campus, Chennai - 25, Tamil Nadu, India.
Jayavel SridharDepartment of Biotechnology (DDE), Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai - 21, Tamil Nadu, India.
Mohan PandiDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, School of Biotechnology, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai - 21, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endophytic fungi are inhabitants of plants, living most part of their lifecycle asymptomatically which mainly confer protection and ecological advantages to the host plant. In this present study, 48 endophytic fungi were isolated from the leaves of three medicinal plants and characterized based on ITS2 sequence - secondary structure analysis. ITS2 secondary structures were elucidated with minimum free energy method (MFOLD version 3.1) and consensus structure of each genus was generated by 4SALE. ProfDistS was used to generate ITS2 sequence structure based phylogenetic tree respectively. Our elucidated isolates were belonging to Ascomycetes family, representing 5 orders and 6 genera. Colletotrichum/Glomerella spp., Diaporthae/Phomopsis spp., and Alternaria spp., were predominantly observed while Cochliobolus sp., Cladosporium sp., and Emericella sp., were represented by singletons. The constructed phylogenetic tree has well resolved monophyletic groups with >50% bootstrap value support. Secondary structures based fungal systematics improves not only the stability; it also increases the precision of phylogenetic inference. Above ITS2 based phylogenetic analysis was performed for our 48 isolates along with sequences of known ex-types taken from GenBank which confirms the efficiency of the proposed method. Further, we propose it as superlative marker for reconstructing phylogenetic relationships at different taxonomic levels due to their lesser length.

Indexed as

4SALEEndophytesITSMEGA 5.1ProfDistSSequence-secondary structure

Identifiers

PMID25097373
PMCPMC4110421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.