Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25097144›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2014

dPIRPLE: a joint estimation framework for deformable registration and penalized-likelihood CT image reconstruction using prior images.

H Dang, A S Wang, Marc S Sussman, J H Siewerdsen, J W Stayman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Direct reconstruction of anatomical change in low-dose lung nodule surveillance.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2021
    Article
  5. Deep learning in medical image registration: a review.Physics in medicine and biology · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Low-Dose CT Perfusion of the Liver using Reconstruction of Difference.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Prospective Image Quality Analysis and Control for Prior-Image-Based Reconstruction of Low-Dose CT.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

H DangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore MD 21205, USA.
A S Wang
Marc S Sussman
J H Siewerdsen
J W Stayman

Funding

Image Science for the New X-ray: Taking NEQ to TaskR01CA112163 · NCI · UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK · PI SIEWERDSEN, JEFFREY H · 2006 to 2014
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS 2R01-CA-112164NCI NIH HHS R01 CA112163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sequential imaging studies are conducted in many clinical scenarios. Prior images from previous studies contain a great deal of patient-specific anatomical information and can be used in conjunction with subsequent imaging acquisitions to maintain image quality while enabling radiation dose reduction (e.g., through sparse angular sampling, reduction in fluence, etc). However, patient motion between images in such sequences results in misregistration between the prior image and current anatomy. Existing prior-image-based approaches often include only a simple rigid registration step that can be insufficient for capturing complex anatomical motion, introducing detrimental effects in subsequent image reconstruction. In this work, we propose a joint framework that estimates the 3D deformation between an unregistered prior image and the current anatomy (based on a subsequent data acquisition) and reconstructs the current anatomical image using a model-based reconstruction approach that includes regularization based on the deformed prior image. This framework is referred to as deformable prior image registration, penalized-likelihood estimation (dPIRPLE). Central to this framework is the inclusion of a 3D B-spline-based free-form-deformation model into the joint registration-reconstruction objective function. The proposed framework is solved using a maximization strategy whereby alternating updates to the registration parameters and image estimates are applied allowing for improvements in both the registration and reconstruction throughout the optimization process. Cadaver experiments were conducted on a cone-beam CT testbench emulating a lung nodule surveillance scenario. Superior reconstruction accuracy and image quality were demonstrated using the dPIRPLE algorithm as compared to more traditional reconstruction methods including filtered backprojection, penalized-likelihood estimation (PLE), prior image penalized-likelihood estimation (PIPLE) without registration, and prior image penalized-likelihood estimation with rigid registration of a prior image (PIRPLE) over a wide range of sampling sparsity and exposure levels.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLikelihood Functions

Identifiers

PMID25097144
PMCPMC4142353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.