Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25097110›Full record

ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2014

How does preeclampsia predispose to future cardiovascular disease?

Dawn C Scantlebury, Sharonne N Hayes

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hypertension reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, obesity, and hypertension in later life by age group: a cross-sectional analysis.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Preeclampsia beyond pregnancy: long-term consequences for mother and child.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dawn C ScantleburyDivision of Cardiovacular Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA, scantlebury.dawn@mayo.edu.
Sharonne N Hayes

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last few decades, there has been increasing emphasis on cardiovascular disease in women and study of female-specific cardiovascular risk factors. Hypertension in pregnancy, and specifically preeclampsia, has been identified as one such risk factor. In this review, we explore the epidemiological evidence for preeclampsia as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. We propose reasons for this association, giving evidence for potential pathways linking preeclampsia with future cardiovascular disease.

Indexed as

Blood PressureCardiovascular DiseasesRisk AssessmentFemaleGlobal HealthHumansIncidencePre-EclampsiaPregnancyRisk Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.