Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25096553›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2014

Acute effects of nonexcitatory electrical stimulation during systole in isolated cardiac myocytes and perfused heart.

Ksenia Blinova, Jayna Stohlman, Victor Krauthamer, Alan Knapton, Eric Bloomquist, Richard A Gray

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ksenia BlinovaCenter for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Jayna StohlmanCenter for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Victor KrauthamerCenter for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Alan KnaptonCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Eric BloomquistCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Richard A GrayCenter for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
United States Food and Drug Administration · USCenter for Devices and Radiological Health · USCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Application of electrical field to the heart during the refractory period of the beat has been shown to increase the force of contraction both in animal models and in heart failure patients (cardiac contractility modulation, or CCM). A direct increase in intracellular calcium during CCM has been suggested to be the mechanism behind the positive inotropic effect of CCM. We studied the effect of CCM on isolated rabbit cardiomyocytes and perfused whole rat hearts. The effect of CCM was observed in single cells via fluorescent measurements of intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca(2+)]i) and cell length (L). Cells were paced once per second throughout these recordings, and CCM stimulation was delivered via biphasic electric fields of 20 ms duration applied during the refractory period. CCM increased the peak amplitude of both [Ca(2+)]i and L for the first beat during CCM compared to control, but then [Ca(2+)]i and L decayed to levels lower than the control. During CCM, all contractions had a faster time to peak for both [Ca(2+)]i and L; after stopping CCM the rise times returned to control levels. In the whole rat heart, the positive inotropic effect of CCM stimulation on left ventricular pressure was completely abolished in the presence of metoprolol, a beta-1 adrenergic blocker. In summary, the CCM-induced changes in intracellular calcium handling by cardiomyocytes did not explain the sustained positive inotropic effect in the whole heart and the β-adrenergic pathway may be involved in the CCM mechanism of action.

Indexed as

Calciumcardiac contractility modulationcardiac electrical stimulationcardiomyocytesfluo‐4optical imaging

Identifiers

PMID25096553
PMCPMC4246583
OpenAlexW2116011790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.