ArticleIntegrative and comparative biology2014
Pulmonary fluid flow challenges for experimental and mathematical modeling.
Article in Integrative and comparative biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thixo-viscoelastoplastic rheological characterisation of human mucus using a multimode BMP constitutive equation approach.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Simulation of drug transport in airway surface liquid considering mucus flow and ciliary interaction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Complex Wave Packet Dynamics Induced by Marangoni Stresses.Industrial & engineering chemistry research · 2025Article
- Non-Cellular Layers of the Respiratory Tract: Protection against Pathogens and Target for Drug Delivery.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Aerosol Transport Modeling: The Key Link Between Lung Infections of Individuals and Populations.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Review
- Spatially distributed infection increases viral load in a computational model of SARS-CoV-2 lung infection.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Molecular Dynamics Simulations to Explore the Structure and Rheological Properties of Normal and Hyperconcentrated Airway Mucus.Studies in applied mathematics (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2021Article
- Determination of rheology and surface tension of airway surface liquid: a review of clinical relevance and measurement techniques.Respiratory research · 2019Review
- Surfactant-induced Marangoni transport of lipids and therapeutics within the lung.Current opinion in colloid & interface science · 2018Article
- Challenge in particle delivery to cells in a microfluidic device.Drug delivery and translational research · 2018Article
- Drop spreading with random viscosity.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2016Article
- Modeling and Simulation of Mucus Flow in Human Bronchial Epithelial Cell Cultures - Part I: Idealized Axisymmetric Swirling Flow.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
- Coming to terms with tissue engineering and regenerative medicine in the lung.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Modeling the flow of fluid in the lungs, even under baseline healthy conditions, presents many challenges. The complex rheology of the fluids, interaction between fluids and structures, and complicated multi-scale geometry all add to the complexity of the problem. We provide a brief overview of approaches used to model three aspects of pulmonary fluid and flow: the surfactant layer in the deep branches of the lung, the mucus layer in the upper airway branches, and closure/reopening of the airway. We discuss models of each aspect, the potential to capture biological and therapeutic information, and open questions worthy of further investigation. We hope to promote multi-disciplinary collaboration by providing insights into mathematical descriptions of fluid-mechanics in the lung and the kinds of predictions these models can make.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.