Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25096270›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2014

A novel exon 17 deletion mutation of RPGRIP1 gene in two siblings with Leber congenital amaurosis.

Takahide Suzuki, Takuro Fujimaki, Ai Yanagawa, Eisuke Arai, Keiko Fujiki, Yuko Wada, Akira Murakami

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Ocular genetics in the Japanese population.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. A homozygous structural variant ofGenetics in medicine open · 2024
    Article
  6. The Structural Abnormalities Are Deeply Involved in the Cause ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Noncoding mutation inMolecular vision · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Takahide SuzukiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8431, Japan.
Takuro Fujimaki
Ai Yanagawa
Eisuke Arai
Keiko Fujiki
Yuko Wada
Akira Murakami
Juntendo University · JPMiyata Eye Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate mutations of causal genes in two affected male siblings of a Japanese family with suspected Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) and to characterize the related clinical features.

methodsAfter obtaining informed consent, genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood of the proband and his family members. Mutation screening was initially performed with microarrays. The PCR and direct sequencing were successively done for confirmation of mutation detected by microarray, and the two patients who are the subjects of this study were also clinically examined.

resultsResults of the microarray suggested deletion of exon 17 of RPGRIP1. Confirmation by PCR and direct sequencing following microarray analysis revealed that both siblings had homozygous deletion of exon 17 of the RPGRIP1 gene, while their unaffected parents were heterozygous carriers. Length of the deletion was 1339 bp including exon 17 at the position of c.2710+372_2895+76del1339. Clinical features of the two siblings showed nystagmus, poor visual acuity, hyperopia, and photophobia since early childhood; but there was no oculo-digital sign, vessel attenuation or RPE mottling from the mid-retina to the periphery. Full-field single flash ERG was recordable but 30 Hz flicker ERG was not detectable.

conclusionsAlthough the present patients did not show sufficient clinical findings as LCA, PCR findings and direct sequencing following microarray analysis confirmed that they were LCA. Genetic analyses are helpful for confirmation of clinical diagnosis.

Indexed as

Sequence DeletionSiblingsChild, PreschoolCytoskeletal ProteinsElectroretinographyExonsHumansInfantLeber Congenital AmaurosisMaleOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPolymerase Chain ReactionProteinsSequence Analysis, DNATomography, Optical CoherenceVisual FieldsCytoskeletal ProteinsProteinsRPGRIP1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID25096270
OpenAlexW1966906295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.