ReviewClinical neuroradiology2015
Diagnostic imaging features of congenital nose and nasal cavity lesions.
Review in Clinical neuroradiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Retrospective Single-Center Study in 20 Patients With Midline Nasal Masses: Which Site Has the Highest Risk of Recurrence?The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology · 2025Article
- Radiologic Diagnosis of Nasal Gliomas with an Illustrative Case Report.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2022Article
- The misdiagnose and treatment of a concealed kind of supernumerary nostril: a case report and review.BMC surgery · 2022Article
- Diagnosis and treatment of congenital nasal glioma.BMJ case reports · 2021Article
- Nasal Cavity CT Imaging Contribution to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Choanal Atresia.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Article
- Article
- CT and MRI of congenital nasal lesions in syndromic conditions.Pediatric radiology · 2015Review
- Multidisciplinary management of nasal and lacrimal drainage disorders in ectrodactyly-ectodermal dysplasia-clefting syndrome.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological SocietyArticle
- Diagnostic accuracy of clinical visual assessment using endoscopic images for nasal cavity mass lesions.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A wide variety of congenital nasal lesions can present to clinical attention due to airway obstruction, the presence of a mass, and/or cosmetic deformity, including pyriform aperture stenosis, choanal atresia, nasopharyngeal atresia, arrhinia, congenital germline fusion cysts, cephaloceles, neuroglial heterotopia, nasolacrimal duct mucoceles, hamartomas, supernumerary nostril, and bifid nose. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, which are the main imaging modalities used to characterize these lesions, often serve complementary roles. Familiarity with embryology and anatomy is also essential for recognizing the diagnostic imaging findings related to congenital nasal lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.