Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25095758›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2014

Viability, growth kinetics and stem cell markers of single and clustered cells in human intervertebral discs: implications for regenerative therapies.

Sarah Turner, Birender Balain, Bruce Caterson, Clare Morgan, Sally Roberts

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Distinguishing characteristics of stem cells derived from different anatomical regions of human degenerated intervertebral discs.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2016
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah TurnerSpinal Studies, TORCH Building, Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oswestry, Shropshire, SY10 7AG, UK, sarah.turner2@rjah.nhs.uk.
Birender Balain
Bruce Caterson
Clare Morgan
Sally Roberts
Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital · GBCardiff University · GBKeele University · GBRobert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0800248Versus Arthritis 19858
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere is much interest in the development of a cellular therapy for the repair or regeneration of degenerate intervertebral discs (IVDs) utilising autologous cells, with some trials already underway. Clusters of cells are commonly found in degenerate IVDs and are formed via cell proliferation, possibly as a repair response. We investigated whether these clusters may be more suitable as a source of cells for biological repair than the single cells in the IVD.

methodsDiscs were obtained at surgery from 95 patients and used to assess the cell viability, growth kinetics and stem or progenitor cell markers in both the single and clustered cell populations.

resultsSixty-nine percent (±15) of cells in disc tissue were viable. The clustered cell population consistently proliferated more slowly in monolayer than single cells, although this difference was only significant at P0-1 and P3-4. Both populations exhibited progenitor or notochordal cell markers [chondroitin sulphate epitopes (3B3(-), 7D4, 4C3 and 6C3), Notch-1, cytokeratin 8 and 19] via immunohistochemical examination; stem cell markers assessed with flow cytometry (CD73, 90 and 105 positivity) were similar to those seen on bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells.

conclusionsThese results confirm those of previous studies indicating that progenitor or stem cells reside in adult human intervertebral discs. However, although the cell clusters have arisen via proliferation, there appear to be no greater incidence of these progenitor cells within clusters compared to single cells. Rather, since they proliferate more slowly in vitro than the single cell population, it may be beneficial to avoid the use of clustered cells when sourcing autologous cells for regenerative therapies.

Indexed as

5'-NucleotidaseAdolescentAdultAntigens, CDBiomarkersCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCell SurvivalChondroitin SulfatesEndoglinEpitopesGPI-Linked ProteinsHumansIntervertebral DiscIntervertebral Disc DegenerationKeratin-195'-NucleotidaseAntigens, CDBiomarkersChondroitin SulfatesEndoglinENG protein, humanEpitopesGPI-Linked ProteinsKeratin-19Keratin-8NOTCH1 protein, humanNT5E protein, humanReceptor, Notch1Receptors, Cell SurfaceThy-1 Antigens

Identifiers

PMID25095758
OpenAlexW2094199726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.