Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25094052›Full record

ReviewVision research2015

Promising and delivering gene therapies for vision loss.

Livia S Carvalho, Luk H Vandenberghe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vision research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Gene Therapy Preserves Retinal Structure and Function in a Mouse Model ofMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Trans-ocular Electric CurrentMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Livia S CarvalhoSchepens Eye Research Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, 20 Staniford Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Luk H VandenbergheSchepens Eye Research Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, 20 Staniford Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA. Electronic address: luk_vandenberghe@meei.harvard.edu.
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · US

Funding

Broad Spectrum Molecular Therapy for Blinding Retina DisordersDP1EY023177 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BENNETT, JEAN · 2012 to 2015
$3.2M
Broad Spectrum Molecular Therapy for Blinding Retina DisordersDP1OD008267 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BENNETT, JEAN · 2011 to 2011
$800k
NEI NIH HHS DP1 EY023177NIH HHS 1DP1OD008267-01NIH HHS DP1 OD008267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The maturity in our understanding of the genetics and the pathogenesis of disease in degenerative retinal disorders has intersected in past years with a novel treatment paradigm in which a genetic intervention may lead to sustained therapeutic benefit, and in some cases even restoration of vision. Here, we review this prospect of retinal gene therapy, discuss the enabling technologies that have led to first-in-human demonstrations of efficacy and safety, and the road that led to this exciting point in time.

Indexed as

BlindnessClinical Trials as TopicDependovirusGenetic TherapyGene Transfer TechniquesHumansRetinal DegenerationAAVClinical trialGene therapyLCALentiviral vectorRetina

Identifiers

PMID25094052
PMCPMC4314511
OpenAlexW1995631875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.