Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25093409›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Development and validation of a social capital questionnaire for adolescent students (SCQ-AS).

Paula Cristina Pelli Paiva, Haroldo Neves de Paiva, Paulo Messias de Oliveira Filho, Joel Alves Lamounier, Efigênia Ferreira e Ferreira, Raquel Conceição Ferreira, Ichiro Kawachi, Patrícia Maria Zarzar

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Use of Digital Technology as a Collaborative Tool among Nursing Students-Survey Study and Validation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Paula Cristina Pelli PaivaDepartment of Child and Adolescent Health, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Haroldo Neves de PaivaDepartment Dentistry, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Diamantina, Brazil.
Paulo Messias de Oliveira FilhoDepartment of Basic Sciences, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Diamantina, Brazil.
Joel Alves LamounierDepartment of Child and Adolescent Health, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Efigênia Ferreira e FerreiraDepartment of Oral Public Health, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Raquel Conceição FerreiraDepartment of Oral Public Health, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Ichiro KawachiDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard School of Public Heath and Medical School, Harvard, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Patrícia Maria ZarzarPediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri · BRHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSocial capital has been studied due to its contextual influence on health. However, no specific assessment tool has been developed and validated for the measurement of social capital among 12-year-old adolescent students. The aim of the present study was to develop and validate a quick, simple assessment tool to measure social capital among adolescent students.

methodsA questionnaire was developed based on a review of relevant literature. For such, searches were made of the Scientific Electronic Library Online, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences, The Cochrane Library, ISI Web of Knowledge, International Database for Medical Literature and PubMed Central bibliographical databases from September 2011 to January 2014 for papers addressing assessment tools for the evaluation of social capital. Focus groups were also formed by adolescent students as well as health, educational and social professionals. The final assessment tool was administered to a convenience sample from two public schools (79 students) and one private school (22 students), comprising a final sample of 101 students. Reliability and internal consistency were evaluated using the Kappa coefficient and Cronbach's alpha coefficient, respectively. Content validity was determined by expert consensus as well as exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.

resultsThe final version of the questionnaire was made up of 12 items. The total scale demonstrated very good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: 0.71). Reproducibility was also very good, as the Kappa coefficient was higher than 0.72 for the majority of items (range: 0.63 to 0.97). Factor analysis grouped the 12 items into four subscales: School Social Cohesion, School Friendships, Neighborhood Social Cohesion and Trust (school and neighborhood).

conclusionsThe present findings indicate the validity and reliability of the Social Capital Questionnaire for Adolescent Students.

Indexed as

Social CapitalStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdolescent DevelopmentAdultBrazilChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMalePsychometricsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID25093409
PMCPMC4122396
OpenAlexW2158990541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.