Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25093283›Full record

ArticleHearing research2014

The relation between auditory-nerve temporal responses and perceptual rate integration in cochlear implants.

Michelle L Hughes, Jacquelyn L Baudhuin, Jenny L Goehring

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effects of electrical stimulation rate in genetically confirmed pre- and post-Synaptic auditory neuropathy in children.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Stimulation Rate and Voice Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implants.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michelle L HughesBoys Town National Research Hospital, 425 North 30th Street, Omaha, NE 68131, USA. Electronic address: michelle.hughes@boystown.org.
Jacquelyn L BaudhuinBoys Town National Research Hospital, 425 North 30th Street, Omaha, NE 68131, USA.
Jenny L GoehringBoys Town National Research Hospital, 425 North 30th Street, Omaha, NE 68131, USA.

Funding

Research Synergy CoreP30DC004662 · NIDCD · FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOME · PI GORGA, MICHAEL P. · 2001 to 2015
$5.9M
PHYSIOLOGY AS A POTENTIAL PREDICTOR OF PERCEPTION IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTSR01DC009595 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI HUGHES, MICHELLE L · 2009 to 2017
$2.7M
Short-Term Research Training for AuD StudentsT35DC008757 · NIDCD · FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOME · PI Kristen L. Janky · 2007 to 2026
$683k
NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC004662NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC04662NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009595NIDCD NIH HHS T35 DC008757
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine auditory-nerve temporal response properties and their relation to psychophysical threshold for electrical pulse trains of varying rates ("rate integration"). The primary hypothesis was that better rate integration (steeper slope) would be correlated with smaller decrements in ECAP amplitude as a function of stimulation rate (shallower slope of the amplitude-rate function), reflecting a larger percentage of the neural population contributing more synchronously to each pulse in the train. Data were obtained for 26 ears in 23 cochlear-implant recipients. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) amplitudes were measured in response to each of 21 pulses in a pulse train for the following rates: 900, 1200, 1800, 2400, and 3500 pps. Psychophysical thresholds were obtained using a 3-interval, forced-choice adaptive procedure for 300-ms pulse trains of the same rates as used for the ECAP measures, which formed the rate-integration function. For each electrode, the slope of the psychophysical rate-integration function was compared to the following ECAP measures: (1) slope of the function comparing average normalized ECAP amplitude across pulses versus stimulation rate ("adaptation"), (2) the rate that produced the maximum alternation depth across the pulse train, and (3) rate at which the alternating pattern ceased (stochastic rate). Results showed no significant relations between the slope of the rate-integration function and any of the ECAP measures when data were collapsed across subjects. However, group data showed that both threshold and average ECAP amplitude decreased with increased stimulus rate, and within-subject analyses showed significant positive correlations between psychophysical thresholds and mean ECAP response amplitudes across the pulse train. These data suggest that ECAP temporal response patterns are complex and further study is required to better understand the relative contributions of adaptation, desynchronization, and firing probabilities of individual neurons that contribute to the aggregate ECAP response.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsAction PotentialsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAuditory PerceptionBionicsChildCochleaCochlear ImplantationCochlear NerveElectric StimulationElectrodesEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemale

Identifiers

PMID25093283
PMCPMC4194221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.