Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25093246›Full record

ArticleMolecular pharmaceutics2014

(68)Ga-PRGD2 PET/CT in the evaluation of Glioma: a prospective study.

Deling Li, Xiaobin Zhao, Liwei Zhang, Fang Li, Nan Ji, Zhixian Gao, Jisheng Wang, Peng Kang, Zhaofei Liu, Jiyun Shi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular pharmaceutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A prospective head-to-head comparison ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Trial
  3. The novel [RSC advances · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Preclinical evaluation of a dual-receptor targeted tracer [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  13. Exploration ofACS omega · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. PotentFrontiers in oncology · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Deling LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University ; China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases (NCRC-ND); Beijing Key Laboratory of Brian Tumor, Beijing, China.
Xiaobin Zhao
Liwei Zhang
Fang Li
Nan Ji
Zhixian Gao
Jisheng Wang
Peng Kang
Zhaofei Liu
Jiyun Shi
Xiaoyuan Chen
Zhaohui Zhu
National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNCapital Medical University · CNPeking University · CNNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Laboratory of Molecular Imaging and NanomedicineZIAEB000073 · NIBIB · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING · PI CHEN, XIAOYUAN · 2010 to 2020
$32.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrin αvβ3 is overexpressed in both neovasculature and glioma cells. We aimed to evaluate (68)gallium-BNOTA-PRGD2 ((68)Ga-PRGD2) as a new reagent for noninvasive integrin αvβ3 imaging in glioma patients. With informed consent, 12 patients with suspicious brain glioma, as diagnosed by enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning, were enrolled to undergo (68)Ga-PRGD2 PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans before surgery. The preoperative images were compared and correlated with the pathologically determined WHO grade. Next, the expression of integrin αvβ3, CD34, and Ki-67 were determined by immunohistochemical staining of the resected brain tumor tissue. Our findings demonstrated that (68)Ga-PRGD2 specifically accumulated in the brain tumors that were rich of integrin αvβ3 and other neovasculature markers, but not in the brain parenchyma other than the choroid plexus. Therefore, (68)Ga-PRGD2 PET/CT was able to evaluate the glioma demarcation more specifically than (18)F-FDG PET/CT. The maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) of (68)Ga-PRGD2, rather than those of (18)F-FDG, were significantly correlated with the glioma grading. The maximum tumor-to-brain ratios (TBRmax) of both tracers were significantly correlated with glioma grading, whereas (68)Ga-PRGD2 seemed to be more superior to (18)F-FDG in differentiating high-grade glioma (HGG) from low-grade glioma (LGG). Moreover, (68)Ga-PRGD2 PET/CT showed different accumulation patterns for HGG of WHO grades III and IV. This is the first noninvasive integrin imaging study, to the best of our knowledge, conducted in preoperative patients with different grades of glioma, and it preliminarily indicated the effectiveness of this novel method for evaluating glioma grading and demarcation.

Indexed as

Coordination ComplexesPeptides, CyclicPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAntigens, CD34BrainBrain NeoplasmsChoroid PlexusFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18Gallium RadioisotopesGliomaHumans68gallium-BNOTA-PRGD2Antigens, CD34Coordination ComplexesFluorodeoxyglucose F18Gallium RadioisotopesIntegrin alphaVbeta3Ki-67 AntigenPeptidesPeptides, CyclicRadiopharmaceuticals68Gagliomaintegrin αvβ3PET/CT

Identifiers

PMID25093246
PMCPMC4224544
OpenAlexW2335634120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.