Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25093083›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2014

Evidence based imaging strategies for solitary pulmonary nodule.

Yi-Xiang J Wang, Jing-Shan Gong, Kenji Suzuki, Sameh K Morcos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. CT and MRI of adrenal gland pathologies.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2018
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Magnetic resonance imaging for lung cancer screen.Journal of thoracic disease · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yi-Xiang J Wang1 Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China ; 2 Department of Radiology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Jinan University Second Clinical Medicine College, Shenzhen 518020, China ; 3 Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA ; 4 Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Jing-Shan Gong1 Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China ; 2 Department of Radiology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Jinan University Second Clinical Medicine College, Shenzhen 518020, China ; 3 Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA ; 4 Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Kenji Suzuki1 Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China ; 2 Department of Radiology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Jinan University Second Clinical Medicine College, Shenzhen 518020, China ; 3 Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA ; 4 Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Sameh K Morcos1 Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China ; 2 Department of Radiology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Jinan University Second Clinical Medicine College, Shenzhen 518020, China ; 3 Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA ; 4 Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) is defined as a rounded opacity ≤3 cm in diameter surrounded by lung parenchyma. The majority of smokers who undergo thin-section CT have SPNs, most of which are smaller than 7 mm. In the past, multiple follow-up examinations over a two-year period, including CT follow-up at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, were recommended when such nodules are detected incidentally. This policy increases radiation burden for the affected population. Nodule features such as shape, edge characteristics, cavitation, and location have not yet been found to be accurate for distinguishing benign from malignant nodules. When SPN is considered to be indeterminate in the initial exam, the risk factor of the patients should be evaluated, which includes patients' age and smoking history. The 2005 Fleischner Society guideline stated that at least 99% of all nodules 4 mm or smaller are benign; when nodule is 5-9 mm in diameter, the best strategy is surveillance. The timing of these control examinations varies according to the nodule size (4-6, or 6-8 mm) and the type of patients, specifically at low or high risk of malignancy concerned. Noncalcified nodules larger than 8 mm diameter bear a substantial risk of malignancy, additional options such as contrast material-enhanced CT, positron emission tomography (PET), percutaneous needle biopsy, and thoracoscopic resection or videoassisted thoracoscopic resection should be considered.

Indexed as

biopsycomputerized tomographyfollow-upguidelinelung cancermagnetic resonance imagingpositron emission tomography (PET)Pulmonary nodule

Identifiers

PMID25093083
PMCPMC4120179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.