Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25093019›Full record

ArticleEURASIP journal on bioinformatics & systems biology2014

Learning restricted Boolean network model by time-series data.

Hongjia Ouyang, Jie Fang, Liangzhong Shen, Edward R Dougherty, Wenbin Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EURASIP journal on bioinformatics & systems biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hongjia OuyangDepartment of Physics and Electronic Information Engineering, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, Zhejiang, China.
Jie FangDepartment of Physics and Electronic Information Engineering, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, Zhejiang, China.
Liangzhong ShenDepartment of Physics and Electronic Information Engineering, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, Zhejiang, China.
Edward R DoughertyDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station 33101, TX, USA ; Computational Biology Division, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix 77843, AZ, USA.
Wenbin LiuDepartment of Physics and Electronic Information Engineering, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, Zhejiang, China ; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station 33101, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restricted Boolean networks are simplified Boolean networks that are required for either negative or positive regulations between genes. Higa et al. (BMC Proc 5:S5, 2011) proposed a three-rule algorithm to infer a restricted Boolean network from time-series data. However, the algorithm suffers from a major drawback, namely, it is very sensitive to noise. In this paper, we systematically analyze the regulatory relationships between genes based on the state switch of the target gene and propose an algorithm with which restricted Boolean networks may be inferred from time-series data. We compare the proposed algorithm with the three-rule algorithm and the best-fit algorithm based on both synthetic networks and a well-studied budding yeast cell cycle network. The performance of the algorithms is evaluated by three distance metrics: the normalized-edge Hamming distance [Formula: see text], the normalized Hamming distance of state transition [Formula: see text], and the steady-state distribution distance μ (ssd). Results show that the proposed algorithm outperforms the others according to both [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], whereas its performance according to μ (ssd) is intermediate between best-fit and the three-rule algorithms. Thus, our new algorithm is more appropriate for inferring interactions between genes from time-series data.

Indexed as

Budding yeast cell cycleInferenceRestricted Boolean network

Identifiers

PMID25093019
PMCPMC4107581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.