Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25092882›Full record

ArticleHealth education research2015

Impact of a brief telephone referral on quitline use, quit attempts and abstinence.

Amanda R Mathew, Jessica L Burris, Anthony J Alberg, K Michael Cummings, Matthew J Carpenter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health education research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Impact of a Smoking Cessation Quitline in Vietnam: Evidence Base and Future Directions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Trial
  2. Evaluation of a Systems-Based Tobacco Cessation Program Using Bedside Volunteers.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amanda R MathewDepartment of Neurosciences, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Hollings Cancer Center and Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA Department of Neurosciences, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Hollings Cancer Center and Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA mathea@musc.edu.
Jessica L BurrisDepartment of Neurosciences, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Hollings Cancer Center and Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA Department of Neurosciences, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Hollings Cancer Center and Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Anthony J AlbergDepartment of Neurosciences, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Hollings Cancer Center and Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA Department of Neurosciences, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Hollings Cancer Center and Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
K Michael CummingsDepartment of Neurosciences, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Hollings Cancer Center and Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA Department of Neurosciences, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Hollings Cancer Center and Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Matthew J CarpenterDepartment of Neurosciences, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Hollings Cancer Center and Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA Department of Neurosciences, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Hollings Cancer Center and Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.

Funding

DRUG ABUSE TRAINING PROGRAMT32DA007288 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Christopher W Cowan, Rachel Penrod-Martin · 1991 to 2026
$11.8M
Brief, Novel Smoking Cessation in Primary Care: A Comparative Effectiveness TrialR01DA021619 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI CARPENTER, MATTHEW J · 2007 to 2017
$4.2M
Stimulus Control and Trajectories of Adolescent SmokingK23DA020482 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI CARPENTER, MATTHEW J · 2007 to 2011
$869k
Distress Intolerance on Smoking Lapse among Motivated vs. Unmotivated SmokersF32DA036947 · NIDA · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI MATHEW, AMANDA R · 2014 to 2015
$115k
NIDA NIH HHS F32 DA036947NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA020482NIDA NIH HHS K23-DA020482NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA021619NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007288NIDA NIH HHS T32DA007288
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quitline use can prompt quit attempts and promote abstinence among smokers, but rates of use are low and outcomes of brief quitline referrals unclear. In this study, a brief intervention was delivered to smokers who expressed motivation to quit in the next 30 days (N = 221) to encourage use of their state quitline. Correlates of quitline use were examined, and quitline callers versus non-callers were compared on the following outcomes at 2-month follow-up: cessation medication use, quit attempts and abstinence. Of the 221 smokers given a quitline referral, 34% called the quitline. Baseline motivation alone distinguished quitline callers from non-callers. Quitline use was positively associated with use of cessation medication, an association that remained robust even after adjusting for baseline motivation to quit. A trend was observed in which callers were marginally more likely than non-callers to report both a 24-h quit attempt and 7-day point prevalence abstinence. Relative to non-callers, callers also endorsed greater confidence to quit and increased self-efficacy to resist smoking temptations at follow-up. This study demonstrates a minimal intervention can promote acceptance of quitlines and favorable cessation outcomes among smokers motivated to quit.

Indexed as

MotivationAdultFemaleHotlinesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRacial GroupsReferral and ConsultationSelf EfficacySex FactorsSmoking CessationTelephone

Identifiers

PMID25092882
PMCPMC4296887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.