Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25092700›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2014

Impact of MIC range for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Streptococcus pneumoniae on the ceftolozane in vivo pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target.

A J Lepak, A Reda, K Marchillo, J Van Hecker, W A Craig, D Andes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. New Perspectives on Antimicrobial Agents: Ceftolozane-Tazobactam.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A J LepakDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, and William S. Middleton VA Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
A RedaDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, and William S. Middleton VA Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
K MarchilloDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, and William S. Middleton VA Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
J Van HeckerDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, and William S. Middleton VA Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
W A CraigDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, and William S. Middleton VA Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
D AndesDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, and William S. Middleton VA Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin, USA dra@medicine.wisc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ceftolozane is a novel cephalosporin with activity against drug-resistant pathogens, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Streptococcus pneumoniae. The in vivo investigation reported here tested the limits of this drug against 20 P. aeruginosa and S. pneumoniae isolates across a wide MIC range and defined resistance mechanisms. The times above the MIC (T>MIC) targets for stasis and 1- and 2-log reductions were 31%, 39%, and 42% for P. aeruginosa and 18%, 24%, and 27% for S. pneumoniae, respectively. The 1-log endpoint was achieved for strains with MICs as high as 16 μg/ml.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCephalosporinsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPseudomonas aeruginosaStreptococcus pneumoniaeAnti-Bacterial AgentsceftolozaneCephalosporins

Identifiers

PMID25092700
PMCPMC4187960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.