Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25092691›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2014

Redefining multidrug-resistant tuberculosis based on clinical response to combination therapy.

Tawanda Gumbo, Jotam G Pasipanodya, Peter Wash, André Burger, Helen McIlleron

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04062201 (An Open Label, Randomized Controlled Trial to Establish the Efficacy and Safety of a Study Strategy Consisting of 6 Months of Bedaquiline), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04062201 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

An Open Label, Randomized Controlled Trial to Establish the Efficacy and Safety of a Study Strategy Consisting of 6 Months of Bedaquiline (BDQ), Delamanid (DLM), and Linezolid (LNZ), With Levofloxacin (LVX) and Clofazimine (CFZ) Compared to the Current South African Standard of Care (Control Strategy) for 9 Months for the Treatment of Rifampicin Resistant Tuberculosis (RR-TB)

TypeinterventionalSponsorWits Health Consortium (Pty) LtdRan2019 to 2024Enrolled402ConditionsTuberculosis, Pre-XDR-TB, Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis, Multi Drug Resistant TuberculosisArmsBedaquiline Oral Tablet, Linezolid Oral Tablet, Delamanid in Oral Dosage Form, Clofazimine Oral Product, Levofloxacin Oral Tablet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A systematic review and meta-analysis of first-line tuberculosis drug concentrations and treatment outcomes.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Artificial intelligence-derived 3-Way Concentration-dependent Antagonism of Gatifloxacin, Pyrazinamide, and Rifampicin During Treatment of Pulmonary Tuberculosis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Trial
  3. Efficacy and Safety of High-Dose Rifampin in Pulmonary Tuberculosis. A Randomized Controlled Trial.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2018
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Integrating Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Operational Research to End Tuberculosis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. The Sterilizing Effect of Intermittent Tedizolid for Pulmonary Tuberculosis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Article
  14. Gatifloxacin Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics-based Optimal Dosing for Pulmonary and Meningeal Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Article
  15. Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Background and Methods and Scientific Evidence Base for Dosing of Second-line Tuberculosis Drugs.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Article
  16. Drug-Penetration Gradients Associated with Acquired Drug Resistance in Patients with Tuberculosis.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Absence of hybridization with the wild-type and mutant rpoB probes in the Genotype MTBDRplus assay detects 'disputed' rifampicin mutations.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tawanda GumboOffice of Global Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Jotam G PasipanodyaOffice of Global Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Peter WashBrewelskloof Hospital, Worcester, South Africa.
André BurgerBrewelskloof Hospital, Worcester, South Africa.
Helen McIlleronDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Observatory, South Africa helen.mcIlleron@uct.ac.za.

Funding

Efflux pump inhibitors to reduce duration of antituberculosis therapyDP2OD001886 · OD · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI GUMBO, TAWANDA · 2007 to 2007
$2.4M
PK-PD of combination antituberculosis therapy for suppression of drug-resistanceR01AI079497 · NIAID · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI GUMBO, TAWANDA · 2008 to 2011
$2.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI079497NIAID NIH HHS R01AI079497NIH HHS DP2 OD001886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In tuberculosis treatment, susceptibility is defined by a critical concentration of 1.0 mg/liter for rifampin and 0.2 or 1.0 mg/liter for low- and high-level isoniazid resistance on the basis of an epidemiologic cutoff method that uses the distribution of the MICs for isolates. However, pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics-based clinical trial simulations suggested that the breakpoints should be 0.0625 mg/liter for rifampin and 0.0312 or 0.125 mg/liter for isoniazid. We examined the outcomes of 36 patients with drug-susceptible tuberculosis whose rifampin and isoniazid MICs were determined, whose plasma drug concentrations were also measured, and who were part of a prospective cohort study in Western Cape, South Africa. We performed classification and regression tree analysis to identify clinical and laboratory factors that predicted 2-month sputum conversion rates and long-term clinical outcomes. Poor long-term clinical outcomes were defined as microbiological failure, relapse, or death within a 2-year follow-up period. Peak drug concentrations and areas under the concentration-time curve were most predictive of outcomes and constituted the primary node, similar to our findings on the larger cohort. However, rifampin and isoniazid MICs improved the predictive capacity of the primary decision node by 20 and 17%, respectively, for these 36 patients. The rifampin MIC cutoff above which there was therapy failure was 0.125 mg/liter, while that of isoniazid was 0.0312 mg/liter; these are similar to those derived in clinical trial simulations. The critical concentrations used to define multidrug resistance for clinical decision making should take clinical outcomes into account.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntitubercular AgentsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialFemaleHumansIsoniazidMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRifampinTuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantYoung AdultAntitubercular AgentsIsoniazidRifampin

Identifiers

PMID25092691
PMCPMC4187940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.