Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25092665›Full record

SynthesisPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2014

Echoes of the spoken past: how auditory cortex hears context during speech perception.

Jeremy I Skipper

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Neural Connectivity in Syntactic Movement Processing.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Autism Pathogenesis: The Superior Colliculus.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  15. Why We Should Study Multimodal Language.Frontiers in psychology · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeremy I SkipperDepartment of Cognitive, Perceptual and Brain Sciences, Institute for Multimodal Communication, University College London, London, WC1H 0AP, UK jskipper@lab-lab.org.
University College London · GB

Funding

Neurobiology of Speech Perception in Real-World ContextsR00HD060307 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SKIPPER, JEREMY I · 2011 to 2013
$634k
NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD060307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What do we hear when someone speaks and what does auditory cortex (AC) do with that sound? Given how meaningful speech is, it might be hypothesized that AC is most active when other people talk so that their productions get decoded. Here, neuroimaging meta-analyses show the opposite: AC is least active and sometimes deactivated when participants listened to meaningful speech compared to less meaningful sounds. Results are explained by an active hypothesis-and-test mechanism where speech production (SP) regions are neurally re-used to predict auditory objects associated with available context. By this model, more AC activity for less meaningful sounds occurs because predictions are less successful from context, requiring further hypotheses be tested. This also explains the large overlap of AC co-activity for less meaningful sounds with meta-analyses of SP. An experiment showed a similar pattern of results for non-verbal context. Specifically, words produced less activity in AC and SP regions when preceded by co-speech gestures that visually described those words compared to those words without gestures. Results collectively suggest that what we 'hear' during real-world speech perception may come more from the brain than our ears and that the function of AC is to confirm or deny internal predictions about the identity of sounds.

Indexed as

GesturesLanguageModels, PsychologicalAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionBrain MappingDatabases, FactualHumansLikelihood FunctionsModels, NeurologicalNeuroimagingSpeech Perceptionauditorybraincontextlanguagemultimodalpredictive

Identifiers

PMID25092665
PMCPMC4123676
OpenAlexW2137231174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.