Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25092646›Full record

ReviewCanadian journal of diabetes2014

Trials in the prevention of type 1 diabetes: current and future.

Diane K Wherrett

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian journal of diabetes, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Type 1 diabetes: where are we in 2017?Translational pediatrics · 2017
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Diane K WherrettDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: diane.wherrett@sickkids.ca.

Funding

Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet: Toronto Clinical CentreU01DK085463 · NIDDK · HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHLDRN (TORONTO) · PI WHERRETT, DIANE K · 2009 to 2013
$1.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK085463
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major thrust in type 1 diabetes research is stopping the destruction of beta cells that leads to type 1 diabetes. Research over the past 30 years has defined genetic factors and evidence of autoimmunity that have led to the development of robust prediction models in those at high risk for type 1 diabetes. The ability to identify those at risk and the development of new agents and of collaborative research networks has led to multiple trials aimed at preventing beta cell loss. Trials at all stages of beta cell loss have been conducted: primary prevention (prior to the development of autoimmunity); secondary prevention (after autoantibodies are found) and tertiary prevention (intervening after diagnosis to maintain remaining beta cells). Studies have shown mixed results; evidence of maintained insulin secretion after the time of diagnosis has been described in a number of studies, and primary and secondary prevention is proving to be elusive. Much has been learned from the increasing number of studies in the field in terms of network creation, study design and choice of intervention that will facilitate new avenues of investigation.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseAutoimmunityClinical Trials as TopicDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1HumansInsulinInsulin-Secreting CellsInsulin SecretionInsulinauto-immunitéautoimmunityclinical trialsdiabète de type 1essais cliniquesgeneticsgénétiqueimmunologieimmunologypreventionpréventiontype 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID25092646
PMCPMC4133140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.