Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25092476›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2014

Sarcopenia: describing rather than defining a condition.

David Rhys Alchin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The Neuromuscular Junction: Roles in Aging and Neuromuscular Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Improper Remodeling of Organelles Deputed to CaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Muscle wasting in heart failure : The role of nutrition.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Moving upwards - the journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle in 2016.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Rapid screening for sarcopenia.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2015
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David Rhys AlchinThe University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia, dalchin@student.unimelb.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional definitions of sarcopenia have described an aging-associated disorder roughly defined as muscle mass two standard deviations below the young adult demographic. In an effort to clear the ambiguity pertaining to such descriptions, two international bodies have put forth working definitions of sarcopenia, namely The Society of Sarcopenia, Cachexia and Wasting Disorders in 2011, and The European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People in 2009. REVIEW: This paper will look at the current zeitgeist of sarcopenia through a range of studies and will argue that what we have is an amalgamated and often conflicted description, rather than a definition, of the sarcopenic condition. Herein, we will consider whether such descriptions of sarcopenia should center on the consideration of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) rather than describing the condition more in terms of muscular pathology.

conclusionConsideration was given to studies of the NMJ to advance the idea that present notions of the sarcopenic condition are incomplete and that at its' core, sarcopenia is an age-related disorder of the NMJ.

Identifiers

PMID25092476
PMCPMC4248413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.