ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2015
Individual differences in the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry and stimulus rivalry.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tagged MEG measures binocular rivalry in a cortical network that predicts alternation rate.PloS one · 2019Trial
- Tracking rivalry with neural rhythms: multivariate SSVEPs reveal perception during binocular rivalry.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2024Article
- Neural Dynamics during Binocular Rivalry: Indications from Human Lateral Geniculate Nucleus.eNeuro · 2023Article
- Predictive context biases binocular rivalry in children and adults with no positive relation to two measures of social cognition.Scientific reports · 2020Observational
- Frequency of alpha oscillation predicts individual differences in perceptual stability during binocular rivalry.Human brain mapping · 2019Article
- What happens in the brain of meditators when perception changes but not the stimulus?PloS one · 2019Article
- Stimulus rivalry and binocular rivalry share a common neural substrate.Journal of vision · 2018Article
- The Independent and Shared Mechanisms of Intrinsic Brain Dynamics: Insights From Bistable Perception.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Attention model of binocular rivalry.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- Chromatic interocular-switch rivalry.Journal of vision · 2017Article
- Filling-in rivalry: Perceptual alternations in the absence of retinal image conflict.Journal of vision · 2017Article
- Serial correlations in Continuous Flash Suppression.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Binocular rivalry and stimulus rivalry are two forms of perceptual instability that arise when the visual system is confronted with conflicting stimulus information. In the case of binocular rivalry, dissimilar monocular stimuli are presented to the two eyes for an extended period of time, whereas for stimulus rivalry the dissimilar monocular stimuli are exchanged rapidly and repetitively between the eyes during extended viewing. With both forms of rivalry, one experiences extended durations of exclusive perceptual dominance that fluctuate between the two stimuli. Whether these two forms of rivalry arise within different stages of visual processing has remained debatable. Using an individual-differences approach, we found that both stimulus rivalry and binocular rivalry exhibited same-shaped distributions of dominance durations among a sample of 30 observers and, moreover, that the dominance durations measured during binocular and stimulus rivalry were significantly correlated among our sample of observers. Furthermore, we found a significant, positive correlation between alternation rate in binocular rivalry and the incidence of stimulus rivalry. These results suggest that the two forms of rivalry may be tapping common neural mechanisms, or at least different mechanisms with comparable time constants. It remains to be learned just why the incidences of binocular rivalry and stimulus rivalry vary so greatly among people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.