Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25092308›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

A computational and neural model of momentary subjective well-being.

Robb B Rutledge, Nikolina Skandali, Peter Dayan, Raymond J Dolan

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 186 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
186citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05065151 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Understanding Motivation in Parkinson's Patients Through Neurophysiology

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2021 to 2030Enrolled70ConditionsParkinson Disease, Deep Brain Stimulation, MotivationArmsStimulation on, Stimulation off, Decision Making Task
NCT07033923 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Neuro-computational Study of Thymic Fluctuations in Mood Disorders - MOODELING

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier St AnneRan2024 to 2029Enrolled588ConditionsDepression, Bipolar Disorder, Recurrent Depression, Mood DisordersArmsBrain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with structural (anatomical) and functional sequences (optional), Computerized cognitive tests, Daily longitudinal monitoring by mobile MOODELING application
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

186 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Dopaminergic Modulation of Decision Making and Subjective Well-Being.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

126 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robb B RutledgeWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom;Max Planck University College London Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, London WC1B 5EH, United Kingdom; and robb.rutledge@ucl.ac.uk.
Nikolina SkandaliWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom;
Peter DayanGatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, United Kingdom.
Raymond J DolanWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom;Max Planck University College London Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, London WC1B 5EH, United Kingdom; and.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 078865/Z/05/ZWellcome Trust 091593Wellcome Trust 091593/Z/10/ZWellcome Trust 095844Wellcome Trust 098362Wellcome Trust 101252/Z/13/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The subjective well-being or happiness of individuals is an important metric for societies. Although happiness is influenced by life circumstances and population demographics such as wealth, we know little about how the cumulative influence of daily life events are aggregated into subjective feelings. Using computational modeling, we show that emotional reactivity in the form of momentary happiness in response to outcomes of a probabilistic reward task is explained not by current task earnings, but by the combined influence of recent reward expectations and prediction errors arising from those expectations. The robustness of this account was evident in a large-scale replication involving 18,420 participants. Using functional MRI, we show that the very same influences account for task-dependent striatal activity in a manner akin to the influences underpinning changes in happiness.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyModels, PsychologicalAdultEmotionsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuronsProbabilityRewardYoung Adultdopamineinsulareward prediction errorstriatum

Identifiers

PMID25092308
PMCPMC4143018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.