ArticleScientific reports2014
Rapid and reagentless detection of microbial contamination within meat utilizing a smartphone-based biosensor.
Article in Scientific reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biosensing Strategies to Monitor Contaminants and Additives on Fish, Meat, Poultry, and Related Products.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Munsell Soil Colour Prediction from the Soil and Soil Colour Book Using Patching Method and Deep Learning Techniques.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A smartphone serves as a data logger for a fully automated lab-constructed microfluidic system.MethodsX · 2024Article
- Advances and Opportunities of Mobile Health in the Postpandemic Era: Smartphonization of Wearable Devices and Wearable Deviceization of Smartphones.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2024Article
- Drug classification with a spectral barcode obtained with a smartphone Raman spectrometer.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Determination of Munsell Soil Colour Using Smartphones.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Nanozymes in Point-of-Care Diagnosis: An Emerging Futuristic Approach for Biosensing.Nano-micro letters · 2021Review
- On-site detection of food and waterborne bacteria - current technologies, challenges, and future directions.Trends in food science & technology · 2021Article
- Recent trends in smartphone-based detection for biomedical applications: a review.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2021Review
- Applications of smartphone-based near-infrared (NIR) imaging, measurement, and spectroscopy technologies to point-of-care (POC) diagnostics.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2021Review
- Capillary-Driven Flow Microfluidics Combined with Smartphone Detection: An Emerging Tool for Point-of-Care Diagnostics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Selective UropathogenicSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- "The Smartphone's Guide to the Galaxy": In Situ Analysis in Space.Biosensors · 2018Review
- Disposable all-printed electronic biosensor for instantaneous detection and classification of pathogens.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Integrated Optical Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Based on Organic-Inorganic Hybrids for Photonics-on-a-Chip Biosensing Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Angular photodiode array-based device to detect bacterial pathogens in a wound model.IEEE sensors journal · 2017Article
- Mie scatter spectra-based device for instant, contact-free, and specific diagnosis of bacterial skin infection.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Smartphone-Based Food Diagnostic Technologies: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Review
- Photonic crystals: emerging biosensors and their promise for point-of-care applications.Chemical Society reviews · 2017Review
- Fast and Inexpensive Detection of Bacterial Viability and Drug Effectiveness through Metabolic Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A smartphone-utilized biosensor was developed for detecting microbial spoilage on ground beef, without using antibodies, microbeads or any other reagents, towards a preliminary screening tool for microbial contamination on meat products, and potentially towards wound infection. Escherichia coli K12 solutions (10(1)-10(8) CFU/mL) were added to ground beef products to simulate microbial spoilage. An 880 nm near infrared LED was irradiated perpendicular to the surface of ground beef, and the scatter signals at various angles were evaluated utilizing the gyro sensor and the digital camera of a smartphone. The angle that maximized the Mie scatter varied by the E. coli concentration: 15° for 10(8) CFU/mL, 30° for 10(4) CFU/mL, and 45° for 10 CFU/mL, etc. SEM and fluorescence microscopy experiments revealed that the antigens and cell fragments from E. coli bonded preferably to the fat particles within meat, and the size and morphologies of such aggregates varied by the E. coli concentration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.