Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25092122›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2014

Factorial experiments: efficient tools for evaluation of intervention components.

Linda M Collins, John J Dziak, Kari C Kugler, Jessica B Trail

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 169 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
169citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01814072 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

Opt-IN: Optimization of Remotely Delivered Intensive Lifestyle Treatment for Obesity

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwestern UniversityRan2013 to 2017Enrolled562ConditionsWeight LossArms12 Telephone Coaching Sessions, 24 Telephone Coaching Sessions, Report to Primary Care Physician, Text Messages, Recommendations to use meal replacements
NCT02592590 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

A Social-Cognitive Smartphone Application for Improving Physical Activity in Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignRan2015 to 2016Enrolled118ConditionsHealth Behavior, Sedentary LifestyleArmsGroup A, Group B, Group C, Group D
NCT05209373 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Compassionate And Loving Mindset Towards HEART Health riSk (CALM HEARTS 2): A Randomized Optimization Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ManitobaRan2022 to 2023Enrolled96ConditionsCardiovascular DiseasesArmsIntervention Condition, Positive Control Condition
NCT06624358 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Physical Activity in Adolescents With Chronic Kidney Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorChildren's Hospital of PhiladelphiaRan2025 to 2028Enrolled100ConditionsChronic Kidney DiseasesArmsIncrease Physical Activity
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

169 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

109 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Linda M CollinsDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies; The Methodology Center. Electronic address: lmcollins@psu.edu.
John J DziakThe Methodology Center.
Kari C KuglerThe Methodology Center.
Jessica B TrailThe Methodology Center; Department of Statistics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.

Funding

Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002014 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI KRASCHNEWSKI, JENNIFER L. · 2016 to 2025
$33.7M
THE REFINEMENT &APPLICATION OF MEDICAL DECISION MAKING IN PREVENTION SCIENCESP50DA010075 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI LANZA, STEPHANIE T · 1996 to 2014
$24.5M
Testing Relapse Recovery Intervention ComponentsP01CA180945 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BOLT, DANIEL M · 2014 to 2023
$23.0M
Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000127 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI SINOWAY, LAWRENCE I · 2012 to 2015
$17.1M
Methods CoreP50CA143188 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BOLT, DANIEL M · 2009 to 2013
$10.5M
Penn State Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002015 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI VAN SCOY, LAUREN JODI · 2016 to 2025
$7.8M
Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteKL2TR000126 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI SINOWAY, LAWRENCE I · 2012 to 2015
$3.2M
Opt-IN: Optimizing INtensive Lifestyle Intervention for Weight LossR01DK097364 · NIDDK · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI COLLINS, LINDA M, SPRING, BONNIE · 2012 to 2016
$3.0M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000126NCATS NIH HHS KL2TR000126NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002015NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000127NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002014NCI NIH HHS P01 CA180945NCI NIH HHS P50 CA143188NCI NIH HHS P50CA143188NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA010075NIDA NIH HHS P50DA010075NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK097364NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK097364
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn understanding of the individual and combined effects of a set of intervention components is important for moving the science of preventive medicine interventions forward. This understanding can often be achieved in an efficient and economical way via a factorial experiment, in which two or more independent variables are manipulated. The factorial experiment is a complement to the RCT; the two designs address different research questions. PURPOSE: To offer an introduction to factorial experiments aimed at investigators trained primarily in the RCT.

methodsThe factorial experiment is compared and contrasted with other experimental designs used commonly in intervention science to highlight where each is most efficient and appropriate.

resultsSeveral points are made: factorial experiments make very efficient use of experimental subjects when the data are properly analyzed; a factorial experiment can have excellent statistical power even if it has relatively few subjects per experimental condition; and when conducting research to select components for inclusion in a multicomponent intervention, interactions should be studied rather than avoided.

conclusionsInvestigators in preventive medicine and related areas should begin considering factorial experiments alongside other approaches. Experimental designs should be chosen from a resource management perspective, which states that the best experimental design is the one that provides the greatest scientific benefit without exceeding available resources.

Indexed as

Research DesignHumansPreventive Health ServicesPreventive MedicineRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID25092122
PMCPMC4171184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.