Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25091925›Full record

ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2014

Mixed urinary incontinence: international urogynecological association research and development committee opinion.

Dorothy Kammerer-Doak, Diaa E E Rizk, Olanrewaju Sorinola, Wael Agur, Sharif Ismail, Tony Bazi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International urogynecology journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03923348 (Pelvic Floor Muscle Training With the Leva® System for Treatment of Urge Predominant Urinary Incontinence), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03923348 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Pelvic Floor Muscle Training With the Leva® System for Treatment of Urge Predominant Urinary Incontinence: A Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Christ HospitalRan2019 to 2020Enrolled5ConditionsOveractive Bladder, Urge Urinary Incontinence, Mixed Urinary IncontinenceArmsLeva device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Twenty-Five Years of the Midurethral Sling: Lessons Learned.International neurourology journal · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dorothy Kammerer-DoakWomen's Pelvic Specialty Care P.C, University of New Mexico Hospital, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Diaa E E Rizk
Olanrewaju Sorinola
Wael Agur
Sharif Ismail
Tony Bazi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimThe definition as well as the treatment of women with mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) is controversial. Since women with MUI are a heterogeneous group, the treatment of MUI requires an individual assessment of the symptom components: stress urinary incontinence, urinary urgency, urgency urinary incontinence, urinary frequency, and nocturia. The purpose of this paper is to summarize the current literature and give an evidence-based review of the assessment and treatment of MUI.

methodsA working subcommittee from the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) Research and Development (R&D) Committee was formed. An initial document addressing the diagnosis and management of MUI was drafted based on a literature review. After evaluation by the entire IUGA R&D Committee, revisions were made, and the final document represents the IUGA R&D Committee Opinion on MUI.

resultsThis R&D Committee Opinion reviews the literature on MUI and summarizes the assessment and treatment with evidence-based recommendations.

conclusionsThe diagnosis of MUI encompasses a very heterogeneous group of women. The evaluation and treatment requires an individualized approach. The use of validated questionnaires is recommended to assess urinary incontinence symptoms and effect on quality of life. Conservative therapy is suggested as a first-line approach; if surgery is contemplated, urodynamic investigation is recommended. Women undergoing surgical treatment for MUI need to be counselled about the possibility of persistence of urinary urgency, frequency and urge incontinence even if stress urinary incontinence is cured.

Indexed as

Acrylic ResinsFemaleGynecological ExaminationHumansHydrogelsNeurotransmitter AgentsQuality of LifeSuburethral SlingsUrinalysisUrinary Incontinence, UrgeUrinary Sphincter, ArtificialUrodynamicsAcrylic ResinsBulkamidHydrogelsNeurotransmitter Agents

Identifiers

PMID25091925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.