Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25091789›Full record

Observational studyIntensive care medicine2014

Eligibility for organ donation following end-of-life decisions: a study performed in 43 French intensive care units.

Olivier Lesieur, Maxime Leloup, Frédéric Gonzalez, Marie-France Mamzer, EPILAT Study Group

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Intensive care medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03021564 (Prospective Multi-centre Observational Study on the Epidemiology, Risk Factors and Consequences of Unexpected Cardiac Arrest in Intensive Care Units.), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03021564 completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Prospective Multi-centre Observational Study on the Epidemiology, Risk Factors and Consequences of Unexpected Cardiac Arrest in Intensive Care Units.

TypeobservationalSponsorGroupe Hospitalier de la Rochelle Ré AunisRan2017 to 2018Enrolled677ConditionsHeart ArrestArmscardiopulmonary resuscitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Assessing Outcomes of Patients Subject to Intensive Care to Facilitate Organ Donation: A Spanish Multicenter Prospective Study.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024
    Article
  3. Regenerative Medicine Approaches in Bioengineering Female Reproductive Tissues.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Olivier LesieurRéanimation, CH Saint-Louis, 17019, La Rochelle, France, olivier.lesieur@gmail.com.
Maxime Leloup
Frédéric Gonzalez
Marie-France Mamzer
EPILAT Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA persistent shortage of available organs for transplantation has driven French medical authorities to focus on organ retrieval from patients who die following the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy. This study was designed to assess the theoretical eligibility of patients who have died in French intensive care units (ICUs) after a decision to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining therapy to organ donation.

methodsThis was an observational multi-center study in which data were collected on all consecutive patients admitted to any of the 43 participating ICUs during the study period who qualified for a withholding/withdrawal procedure according to French law. The theoretical organ donor eligibility of the patients once deceased was determined a posteriori according to current medical criteria for graft selection, as well as according to the withholding/withdrawal measures implemented and their impact on the time of death.

resultsA total of 5,589 patients were admitted to the ICU during the study period, of whom 777 (14 %) underwent withholding/withdrawal measures. Of the 557 patients who died following a foreseeable circulatory arrest, 278 (50 %) presented a contraindication ruling out organ retrieval. Of the 279 patients who would have been eligible as organ donors regardless of measures implemented, cardiopulmonary support was withdrawn in only 154 of these patients, 70 of whom died within 120 min of the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. Brain-injured patients accounted for 29 % of all patients who qualified for the withholding/withdrawal of treatment, and 57 % of those died within 120 min of the withdrawal/withholding of treatment.

conclusionA significant number of patients who died during the study period in French ICUs under withholding/withdrawal conditions would have been eligible for organ donation. Brain-injured patients were more likely to die in circumstances which would have been compatible with such practice.

Indexed as

Donor SelectionIntensive Care UnitsLife Support CareWithholding TreatmentAgedFemaleFranceHumansMale

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.