Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25091645›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part C, Methods2015

Microfluidic capture of endothelial colony-forming cells from human adult peripheral blood: phenotypic and functional validation in vivo.

Ruei-Zeng Lin, Adam Hatch, Victor G Antontsev, Shashi K Murthy, Juan M Melero-Martin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Human Endothelial Colony-Forming Cells.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Building Blood Vessels with Vascular Progenitor Cells.Trends in molecular medicine · 2018
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ruei-Zeng Lin1 Department of Cardiac Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts.
Adam Hatch
Victor G Antontsev
Shashi K Murthy
Juan M Melero-Martin
Harvard University · USNortheastern University · USEastern University · BD

Funding

Microfluidic Cell Separation for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineR01EB009327 · NIBIB · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI MURTHY, SHASHI · 2010 to 2012
$1.8M
Engineering vascularized tissue in vivo using postnatal progenitor cellsR00EB009096 · NIBIB · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI MELERO-MARTIN, JUAN M · 2011 to 2013
$719k
Engineering vascularized tissue in vivo using postnatal progenitor cellsK99EB009096 · NIBIB · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI MELERO-MARTIN, JUAN M · 2009 to 2010
$180k
NIBIB NIH HHS K99 EB009096NIBIB NIH HHS R00 EB009096NIBIB NIH HHS R00EB009096NIBIB NIH HHS R01EB009327
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEndothelial colony-forming cells (ECFCs) are endothelial progenitors that circulate in peripheral blood and are currently the subject of intensive investigation due to their therapeutic potential. However, in adults, ECFCs comprise a very small subset among circulating cells, which makes their isolation a challenge. MATERIALS AND

methodsCurrently, the standard method for ECFC isolation relies on the separation of mononuclear cells and erythrocyte lysis, steps that are time consuming and known to increase cell loss. Alternatively, we previously developed a novel disposable microfluidic platform containing antibody-functionalized degradable hydrogel coatings that is ideally suited for capturing low-abundance circulating cells from unprocessed blood. In this study, we reasoned that this microfluidic approach could effectively isolate rare ECFCs by virtue of their CD34 expression.

resultsWe conducted preclinical experiments with peripheral blood from four adult volunteers and demonstrated that the actual microfluidic capture of circulating CD34(+) cells from unprocessed blood was compatible with the subsequent differentiation of these cells into ECFCs. Moreover, the ECFC yield obtained with the microfluidic system was comparable to that of the standard method. Importantly, we unequivocally validated the phenotypical and functional properties of the captured ECFCs, including the ability to form microvascular networks following transplantation into immunodeficient mice. DISCUSSION: We showed that the simplicity and versatility of our microfluidic system could be very instrumental for ECFC isolation while preserving their therapeutic potential. We anticipate our results will facilitate additional development of clinically suitable microfluidic devices by the vascular therapeutic and diagnostic industry.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsBlood CellsColony-Forming Units AssayEndothelial CellsHumansMice, NudeMicrofluidicsNeovascularization, PhysiologicPhenotypeReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID25091645
PMCPMC4346233
OpenAlexW2325847943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.