ArticleBMC genomics2014
Positive Darwinian selection in the singularly large taste receptor gene family of an 'ancient' fish, Latimeria chalumnae.
Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dietary responses of taste receptor genes to plant-based diets in farmed fish: A literature review.Open veterinary journal · 2026Review
- Rapid expansion and specialization of the TAS2R bitter taste receptor family in amphibians.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- The Remarkable Diversity of Vertebrate Bitter Taste Receptors: Recent Advances in Genomic and Functional Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Membrane-bound chemoreception of bitter bile acids and peptides is mediated by the same subset of bitter taste receptors.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024Article
- A singular shark bitter taste receptor provides insights into the evolution of bitter taste perception.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Evolution of bitter receptor genes and ontogenetic dietary shift in a frog.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Bitter taste receptors along the gastrointestinal tract: comparison between humans and rodents.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Review
- Evolutionary insights into umami, sweet, and bitter taste receptors in amphibians.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Expression profiles and functional characterization of common carp (Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2021Article
- Bitter taste receptors: Genes, evolution and health.Evolution, medicine, and public health · 2021Review
- Coding of pheromones by vomeronasal receptors.Cell and tissue research · 2021Review
- Article
- Genome sequence of walking catfish (Clarias batrachus) provides insights into terrestrial adaptation.BMC genomics · 2018Article
- From Cell to Beak: In-Vitro and In-Vivo Characterization of Chicken Bitter Taste Thresholds.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
- Article
- Comprehensive Analysis of Mouse Bitter Taste Receptors Reveals Different Molecular Receptive Ranges for Orthologous Receptors in Mice and Humans.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2016Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChemical senses are one of the foremost means by which organisms make sense of their environment, among them the olfactory and gustatory sense of vertebrates and arthropods. Both senses use large repertoires of receptors to achieve perception of complex chemosensory stimuli. High evolutionary dynamics of some olfactory and gustatory receptor gene families result in considerable variance of chemosensory perception between species. Interestingly, both ora/v1r genes and the closely related t2r genes constitute small and rather conserved families in teleost fish, but show rapid evolution and large species differences in tetrapods. To understand this transition, chemosensory gene repertoires of earlier diverging members of the tetrapod lineage, i.e. lobe-finned fish such as Latimeria would be of high interest.
resultsWe report here the complete T2R repertoire of Latimeria chalumnae, using thorough data mining and extensive phylogenetic analysis. Eighty t2r genes were identified, by far the largest family reported for any species so far. The genomic neighborhood of t2r genes is enriched in repeat elements, which may have facilitated the extensive gene duplication events resulting in such a large family. Examination of non-synonymous vs. synonymous substitution rates (dN/dS) suggests pronounced positive Darwinian selection in Latimeria T2Rs, conceivably ensuring efficient neo-functionalization of newly born t2r genes. Notably, both traits, positive selection and enrichment of repeat elements in the genomic neighborhood, are absent in the twenty v1r genes of Latimeria. Sequence divergence in Latimeria T2Rs and V1Rs is high, reminescent of the corresponding teleost families. Some conserved sequence motifs of Latimeria T2Rs and V1Rs are shared with the respective teleost but not tetrapod genes, consistent with a potential role of such motifs in detection of aquatic chemosensory stimuli.
conclusionsThe singularly large T2R repertoire of Latimeria may have been generated by facilitating local gene duplication via increased density of repeat elements, and efficient neofunctionalization via positive Darwinian selection.The high evolutionary dynamics of tetrapod t2r gene families precedes the emergence of tetrapods, i.e. the water-to-land transition, and thus constitutes a basal feature of the lobe-finned lineage of vertebrates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.