Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25091503›Full record

Observational studyThe pharmacogenomics journal2015

Tamoxifen metabolism predicts drug concentrations and outcome in premenopausal patients with early breast cancer.

P Saladores, T Mürdter, D Eccles, B Chowbay, N K Zgheib, S Winter, B Ganchev, B Eccles, S Gerty, A Tfayli and 11 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The pharmacogenomics journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 86 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03582865 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Genetic Study of CYP2D6 Enzyme and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Tamoxifen in Premenopausal Women With Breast Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled100ConditionsBreast CancerArmsTamoxifen 20 mg
NCT03935282 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Assessing Effectiveness and Implementation of an EHR Tool to Assess Heart Health Among Survivors (AH-HA)

TypeinterventionalSponsorWake Forest University Health SciencesRan2020 to 2025Enrolled645ConditionsBreast Neoplasm, Prostatic Neoplasm, Colorectal Neoplasms, Endometrial NeoplasmsArmsAH-HA Tool in the EPIC EHR
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 198 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Polymorphism at 19q13.41 Predicts Breast Cancer Survival Specifically after Endocrine Therapy.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2015
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Genes · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Journal of personalized medicine · 2025
    Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

P Saladores1] Dr Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany [2] University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
T Mürdter1] Dr Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany [2] University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
D Eccles1] Faculty of Medicine, Cancer Sciences Academic Unit and University of Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK [2] University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
B Chowbay1] Clinical Pharmacology Laboratory, Division of Medical Sciences, Humphrey Oei Institute of Cancer Research, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore [2] Academic Medicine Research Institute, Office of Clinical Sciences, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School Singapore, Singapore, Singapore [3] SingHealth Clinical Pharmacology Core, Academia, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore.
N K ZgheibFaculty of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
S Winter1] Dr Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany [2] University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
B Ganchev1] Dr Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany [2] University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
B Eccles1] Faculty of Medicine, Cancer Sciences Academic Unit and University of Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK [2] University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
S Gerty1] Faculty of Medicine, Cancer Sciences Academic Unit and University of Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK [2] University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
A TfayliHematology-Oncology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
J S L LimClinical Pharmacology Laboratory, Division of Medical Sciences, Humphrey Oei Institute of Cancer Research, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Y S YapDepartment of Medical Oncology, Humphrey Oei Institute of Cancer Research, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
R C H NgDepartment of Medical Oncology, Humphrey Oei Institute of Cancer Research, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
N S WongDepartment of Medical Oncology, Humphrey Oei Institute of Cancer Research, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
R DentDepartment of Medical Oncology, Humphrey Oei Institute of Cancer Research, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
M Z HabbalDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
E Schaeffeler1] Dr Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany [2] University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
M Eichelbaum1] Dr Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany [2] University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
W Schroth1] Dr Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany [2] University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
M Schwab1] Dr Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany [2] Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany [3] German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
H Brauch1] Dr Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany [2] University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany [3] German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
National Cancer Centre Singapore · SGDr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DEAmerican University of Beirut · LBUniversity of Southampton · GBUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen · DE

Funding

Cancer Research UK 19187Medical Research Council NMRC/1159/2008Medical Research Council NMRCG13161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tamoxifen is the standard-of-care treatment for estrogen receptor-positive premenopausal breast cancer. We examined tamoxifen metabolism via blood metabolite concentrations and germline variations of CYP3A5, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 in 587 premenopausal patients (Asians, Middle Eastern Arabs, Caucasian-UK; median age 39 years) and clinical outcome in 306 patients. N-desmethyltamoxifen (DM-Tam)/(Z)-endoxifen and CYP2D6 phenotype significantly correlated across ethnicities (R(2): 53%, P<10(-77)). CYP2C19 and CYP2C9 correlated with norendoxifen and (Z)-4-hydroxytamoxifen concentrations, respectively (P<0.001). DM-Tam was influenced by body mass index (P<0.001). Improved distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) was associated with decreasing DM-Tam/(Z)-endoxifen (P=0.036) and increasing CYP2D6 activity score (hazard ratio (HR)=0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.43-0.91; P=0.013). Low (<14 nM) compared with high (>35 nM) endoxifen concentrations were associated with shorter DRFS (univariate P=0.03; multivariate HR=1.94; 95% CI, 1.04-4.14; P=0.064). Our data indicate that endoxifen formation in premenopausal women depends on CYP2D6 irrespective of ethnicity. Low endoxifen concentration/formation and decreased CYP2D6 activity predict shorter DRFS.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerAdultAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPremenopauseProspective StudiesTamoxifenTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID25091503
PMCPMC4308646
OpenAlexW1978470279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.