Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25091168›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2015

Effect of plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPR) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation on oats in saline-alkali soil contaminated by petroleum to enhance phytoremediation.

Feifei Xun, Baoming Xie, Shasha Liu, Changhong Guo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
15.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 227 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Phytoremediation of Oil-Contaminated Soil byPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Microorganisms · 2024
    Article
  7. The Contribution ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Microorganisms · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Effects of microbial agents on cadmium uptake inFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Bibliometric Analysis of Current Status on Bioremediation of Petroleum Contaminated Soils during 2000-2019.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Feifei XunKey Laboratory of Molecular and Cytogenetics, Heilongjiang Province, College of Life Science and Technology, Harbin Normal University, Harbin, 150025, China.
Baoming Xie
Shasha Liu
Changhong Guo
Harbin Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the effect of plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPR) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on phytoremediation in saline-alkali soil contaminated by petroleum, saline-alkali soil samples were artificially mixed with different amount of oil, 5 and 10 g/kg, respectively. Pot experiments with oat plants (Avena sativa) were conducted under greenhouse condition for 60 days. Plant biomass, physiological parameters in leaves, soil enzymes, and degradation rate of total petroleum hydrocarbon were measured. The result demonstrated that petroleum inhibited the growth of the plant; however, inoculation with PGPR in combination with AMF resulted in an increase in dry weight and stem height compared with noninoculated controls. Petroleum stress increased the accumulation of malondialdehyde (MDA) and free proline and the activities of the antioxidant enzyme such as superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxidase. Application of PGPR and AMF augmented the activities of three enzymes compared to their respective uninoculated controls, but decreased the MDA and free proline contents, indicating that PGPR and AMF could make the plants more tolerant to harmful hydrocarbon contaminants. It also improved the soil quality by increasing the activities of soil enzyme such as urease, sucrase, and dehydrogenase. In addition, the degradation rate of total petroleum hydrocarbon during treatment with PGPR and AMF in moderately contaminated soil reached a maximum of 49.73%. Therefore, we concluded the plants treated with a combination of PGPR and AMF had a high potential to contribute to remediation of saline-alkali soil contaminated with petroleum.

Indexed as

Petroleum PollutionAlkaliesAntioxidantsAvenaBacteriaBiodegradation, EnvironmentalBiomassHydrocarbonsHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMalondialdehydeMycorrhizaePetroleumPlant DevelopmentPlant LeavesPlantsPoaceaeAlkaliesAntioxidantsHydrocarbonsMalondialdehydePetroleumProlineSoilSoil Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID25091168
OpenAlexW2090931280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.