Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25090022›Full record

ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2014

Gestational diabetes and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy among women veterans deployed in service of operations in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Jodie Katon, Kristin Mattocks, Laurie Zephyrin, Gayle Reiber, Elizabeth M Yano, Lisa Callegari, Eleanor Bimla Schwarz, Joseph Goulet, Jonathan Shaw, Cynthia Brandt and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The impact of military sexual trauma and warfare exposure on women veterans' perinatal outcomes.Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Jodie Katon1 Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) , Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Kristin Mattocks
Laurie Zephyrin
Gayle Reiber
Elizabeth M Yano
Lisa Callegari
Eleanor Bimla Schwarz
Joseph Goulet
Jonathan Shaw
Cynthia Brandt
Sally Haskell
University of Washington · USVA Connecticut Healthcare System · USStanford University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USVA Central Western Massachusetts Healthcare System · USVA NY Harbor Healthcare System · USYale University · US

Funding

Yale University Clinical and Translational Science Award ProgramUL1TR000142 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SHERWIN, ROBERT S · 2012 to 2015
$31.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the prevalence of gestational diabetes (GDM) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) among women Veterans using Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) maternity benefits previously deployed in service of Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation New Dawn (OEF/OIF/OND), and whether pregnancy complications were associated with VA use following delivery.

methodsWe identified the study population through linkage with the Department of Defense roster and VA administrative and clinical data. GDM and HDP were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes in VA inpatient or outpatient files. Similarly, we constructed a nationally representative sample of deliveries from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. We calculated standardized incidence ratios (SIR) adjusted for age and year of delivery to compare rates of GDM and HDP. Proportional hazards regression was used to determine whether pregnancy complications were associated with use of VA following delivery.

resultsBetween 2001 and 2010, 2,288 women OEF/OIF/OND Veterans used VA maternity benefits; 5.2% had GDM and 9.6% had HDP. Compared with women delivering in the United States, women OEF/OIF/OND Veterans using VA maternity benefits had higher risk of developing GDM (SIR: 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16, 1.68) and HDP (SIR: 1.32; 95% CI 1.15, 1.51). Among women OEF/OIF/OND Veterans using VA maternity benefits, GDM (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.83, 1.24) and HDP (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.92, 1.25) were not associated with use of VA following delivery.

conclusionsNon-VA providers should be aware of their patients' Veteran status and the associated elevated risk for pregnancy complications. Within VA, focused efforts to optimize Veterans' preconception and postpartum health are needed.

Indexed as

Afghan Campaign 2001-Iraq War, 2003-2011AdolescentAdultAfghanistanDiabetes, GestationalFemaleHospitals, VeteransHumansHypertension, Pregnancy-InducedIraqKaplan-Meier EstimateMaternal Health ServicesPregnancyPrevalenceRisk

Identifiers

PMID25090022
PMCPMC4195229
OpenAlexW2016091375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.