Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25089943›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in pediatrics2014

Advances in the treatment of aortic valve disease: is it time for companion diagnostics?

Robert B Hinton

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in pediatrics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert B HintonDivision of Cardiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · US

Funding

Angiogenesis due to Elastic Fiber Fragmentation in Early Aortic Valve Disease-ResR56HL117851 · NHLBI · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI HINTON, ROBERT BRUCE · 2014 to 2014
$390k
NHLBI NIH HHS R56 HL117851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAortic valve disease (AVD) is a growing public health problem, and the pathogenesis underlying AVD is complex. The lack of durable bioprostheses and pharmacologic therapies remain central needs in care. The purpose of this review is to highlight recent clinical studies that impact the care of children with AVD and is to explore ongoing translational research efforts. RECENT

findingsClinical studies have evaluated the durability of bioprosthetics and surgical strategies, tested statins during early disease, and identified new predictive biomarkers. Large animal models have demonstrated the effectiveness of a novel bioprosthetic scaffold. Mouse models of latent AVD have advanced our ability to elucidate natural history and perform preclinical studies that test new treatments in the context of early disease. SUMMARY: Current priorities for AVD patients include identifying new pharmacologic treatments and developing durable bioprostheses. Multidisciplinary efforts are needed that bridge pediatric and adult programs, and bring together different types of expertise and leverage network and consortium resources. As our understanding of the underlying complex genetics is better defined, companion diagnostics may transform future clinical trials and ultimately improve the care of patients with AVD by promoting personalized medicine and early intervention.

Indexed as

BioprosthesisHeart Valve ProsthesisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationAnimalsAortic ValveBicuspid Aortic Valve DiseaseChildDisease Models, AnimalHeart Defects, CongenitalHeart Valve DiseasesHumansMiceNeeds AssessmentPrecision MedicineProsthesis DesignProsthesis Failure

Identifiers

PMID25089943
PMCPMC4176693
OpenAlexW2318954867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.